| | | 
07-13-2012, 10:50 PM
|
#1 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 32
| What is YOUR SAT score?
& did you study?
| 
| Reply
| |
07-13-2012, 10:56 PM
|
#2 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 189
|
2250 with study
| |
| Reply
| |
07-14-2012, 01:17 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,913
|
2070 with a little study
| |
| Reply
| |
07-14-2012, 03:17 AM
|
#4 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: California
Posts: 52
|
2250-2300 with alot of study
| |
| Reply
| |
07-14-2012, 08:24 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 895
|
2230 (710 M, 740 CR, 780 W) with an online prep course - my mother said I had to complete it or she wouldn't let me take the SAT, though when she wasn't looking I just went on Facebook and played Tetris - and flipping through parts of an SAT book.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-17-2012, 11:45 PM
|
#6 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Maryland
Posts: 221
|
2340 (780s) with no studying. I'm a strong believer in the SAT still being an aptitude test, so I don't think it's fair for anyone to study.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 12:26 AM
|
#7 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 106
|
1860... Didn't study as much as I should have, which is evident in my score.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 12:28 AM
|
#8 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 154
|
2290 and yeah I studied.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 07:55 AM
|
#9 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 642
|
2360 with a freaky amount of study.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 11:39 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,703
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ameliab12 2340 (780s) with no studying. I'm a strong believer in the SAT still being an aptitude test, so I don't think it's fair for anyone to study. | But then, you got a 2340.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 12:06 PM
|
#11 | | New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
|
2220 no study.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 02:09 PM
|
#12 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Maryland
Posts: 221
|
@sylvan8798 Exactly. I think the 2340 is an accurate representation of my abilities. Maybe I could have scored higher if I studied, but I know that I am not innately smart enough to get a 2400. I think studying throws off the relative scoring that the SAT is supposed to provide.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 02:11 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,913
|
Yesterday my friend was just bashing and criticizing the entire SAT for how trivial it is. Mostly because it doesn't really measure anything except how well you take a test. He got a 2290 with no study whatsoever.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 02:14 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,021
|
2090 studied. basically went through some practice tests. I practiced individual sections at a time though, I never did a full test at once.
| |
| Reply
| |
07-18-2012, 02:19 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 1,913
|
Apparently my SAT scores show a negative correlation between studying and section score:
Math: 800, no studying
Writing: 660, a little review of grammar
Reading: 610, several practice sections
2070 total
Obviously this doesn't mean that studying yields a negative score (since I'm good at math but average at reading/writing) but I was wondering if anyone else had the same thing.
| |
| Reply
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM. |
