College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > SAT and ACT Tests & Test Preparation

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-03-2008, 08:50 AM   #196
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: LA
Posts: 166
The difference is that I would distinguish between a regular class and the SAT. A tutor for a regular class should help someone learn more. In that regard hiring a tutor improves their education. There's nothing wrong with that.

With the SAT, a tutor isn't going to help them learn more, only do better on a test. Hiring a tutor for the SAT (to me at least) simply seems like buying extra points others may not be able to afford.
ThisCouldBeHeavn is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 04:52 PM   #197
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 332
ha funny thing is that my "SAT prep" school/class was sued by CollegeBoard just recently. I laughed cause that class didnt help me at all and it was a POS
iambored10 is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 10:21 AM   #198
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 196
Test Prep

So, what we have here are some blanket statements that imply that capitalism is basically a bad system:
"If anyone can afford something someone else can't, that's unfair."
Ridiculous. I would say, if you don't like it, you don't have to live under it. There are plenty of democratic systems which a more socialist bent to choose from.
Also, apparently some people think that others should be told what they can spend their money on.
Or perhaps they think that putting money in the stock market (which perhaps "some people can't afford to do, so it's unfair") is a better investment than a child's education and future.
Or that helping someone who isn't born with the testing gene (an "unfair advantage" in itself) is somehow unfair. That's backwards logic.
Do you really think that if prep didn't work, it would be such a booming business?
Test prep companies and tutors provide a service just like everything else.
Some people would only get the same results if they studied the SAT for years and years. So they hire a professional. For those who feel that kids spend too much time on the SAT's, hiring someone to distill it for them saves time, not the reverse.
For those who don't need it, well, duh, don't buy it, just like everything else.
I didn't use any prep myself, but apparently I was born with the testing gene. My dad scored a perfect on all of his Regents exams, so I'm willing to bet it's really genetic.
But a lot of folks aren't. If they are willing to learn as much as they can and work hard to improve, should I just say: "No, sorry, can't help you, you should have been born with a different genetic profile, tough luck." Or should I help them?
montrose9272 is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0