College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > SAT and ACT Tests & Test Preparation
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2005, 03:10 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wharton, University of Pennsylvania C/o 2010
Threads: 35
Posts: 371
Official Ap Chemistry Fr Discussion

Here it is! Let's talk
tm2000 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:24 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wharton, University of Pennsylvania C/o 2010
Threads: 35
Posts: 371
Ok well on number 1, i don't remember my answers. However, I know methanoic acid was stronger.

I did number 3: Here's a BIG question I have here. For the value of the rate constant, i put 610. I know, when you test the 1 reaction, you get about 611.7. HOWEVER, because of sig figs, i put 610, since the concentrations only had 2 sig figs. I also tested the other reaction, and got answers in the 610'2. SO i don't know, hoefully I'll get credit.
Ln(h2o2) was the answer for the graph, seconds to the minus one, and I THINK the line should be drawn above the first (a slope not as steep).

OK, for 4. Here's what I did:
Zn + Ni2+ --- Zn2+ + Ni
Al(OH)3 + OH- ---- Al(OH)4 -
C2H2 + O2 --- H2O + CO2
Li + N2 --- Li3N
Pb2+ + I- === PbI2

I know everyone is right except the aluminum one (complex ion), although im pretty sure its right.

For 5, i missed the splint one, but diff reactions are supposed to occur.
CaO will be basic, SiO2 neutral, CO2 acidic (H2CO3)
Ag2S is black, 1/3 AgCl will precipitate, sol 1 is Ag NO3, 2 is Na2S, 3 is KC;.

6: C with for bonds to each F
P with five bonds to Fs
S with four bonds to F and one pair of elctrons
bond anlge is 109.5
sp3d for pf5
and seesaw for sf4
4 sigmas, 1 pi
structrue 1 is best (no formal charge)

7: NH3 is hydrogen bonding, NF3 is DIPOLE DIPOLE, difference cuz hydrogen bonding is stronger than dipole
KCl and NaCl is ionic bonding,
NaCl is stronger cuz closer atomic radii

quantum level is 3, shielding is the reason for ion. energies, cuz theres a stronger nuclear pull on the outer electrons as one goes right across periodic table

Cu is element, (for what reason, i said cuz the isotopes weights seem like to average to CU's weight)
62.93 is more abundant cuz of the weighted average concept, it's weight is closer to Cu's weight.

Ok, so that's what i did!
tm2000 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:25 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wharton, University of Pennsylvania C/o 2010
Threads: 35
Posts: 371
o, if i said ''atomic weight'' instead of ''mass,'' will i be counted against? i wasn't sure which to use.
tm2000 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:28 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: FL - yes i know it sucks here
Threads: 30
Posts: 649
Did anyone get CH4O as the emperical formula?

Flame tests:
1. NO2 - Flame is turned down. Sometimes there is brown fumes coming out.
2.H2 - Small combustion with a "pop" sound
3.O2- flame rekindles.
primitivefuture is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:28 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Threads: 24
Posts: 232
tm2000, you are supposed to say atomic weight. Use atomic weight, because you are compiling a weighted average of the different weights. I didn't get that SiO2 would be neutral, I said acidic.

Also, if anyone did question 2, did you get the empirical formula to be C2H2O5, and that the acidity of 2.6 pH was due to a carboxyl group?
HELTAHIR is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:29 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: FL - yes i know it sucks here
Threads: 30
Posts: 649
I got 2.6 as the pH too.
primitivefuture is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:32 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Threads: 24
Posts: 232
What? What are you talking about primitivefuture? The problem already said the pH was 2.6. It asked you what functional group was responsible for this. I said carboxyl group, and got C2H2Of as empirical.
HELTAHIR is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:33 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 28
Posts: 159
Heltahir, I got pH 2.6 too and the carboxyl group
berry986 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:45 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wharton, University of Pennsylvania C/o 2010
Threads: 35
Posts: 371
SiO2 is netural, cuz SiO2 has network covalent bonding, it's IMFs are too strong and won't react with water's hydrogen bonds.

http://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/group4/oxides.html

"Silicon dioxide doesn't react with water, because of the difficulty of breaking up the giant covalent structure. "
tm2000 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:47 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Threads: 12
Posts: 190
Its kinda funny that they would give you a combustion reaction for one of the written formulas. Its a free 2 points if you know one of the most basic concepts of chemistry. I also got 2.6 for the pH and put the exact same answer as primitivefuture, minus that it turns brown when exposed to nitrogen. I believe you are correct though. TM2000 I think they might take off a point if you don't mention shielding on 7. Hoping for a 3
madskier87 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:51 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Threads: 4
Posts: 36
other reactions were:
CaCO3 + HC2H3O2 >>> Ca2+ + C2H3O2- + H2O + CO2

BF3 + NH3 >>> F3B:NH3

SO3 + OH- >>> HSO4-
homie is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:51 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Threads: 12
Posts: 190
o yeah, I have another question. What were the units on the straight line graph one? I put log(concentration). I also drew a straight line from the starting point, but it had a less steep slope.
madskier87 is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:54 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the midwest
Threads: 4
Posts: 282
I also did the log of concentration. for the graph I actually plotted out all the points
greygoo is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 03:56 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Threads: 4
Posts: 36
i think it was natural log ( ln [H2O2] ) because it says the reaction was first order
homie is offline  
Old 05-12-2005, 04:03 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wharton, University of Pennsylvania C/o 2010
Threads: 35
Posts: 371
umm, i don't think shielding is right. I was looking at answer keys for past FRs very similiar to this, and some actually say shielding is not a correct response. Cl is a common ion for both, so it doesn't matter.
tm2000 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0