College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > SAT and ACT Tests & Test Preparation > SAT Preparation
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-24-2007, 07:06 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 687
Princeton Review

few questions about princeton review SAT prep.

1. Are there practice tests from their prep courses such as their online course more accurate than the cracking the SAT by PR prep book?
2. Has anyone tried the online 99 dollar course, is it worth the money?
3. is it wise to compliment the cracking SAT book with another book, such as barrons 2400?
4. Have you people who have done just the cracking the SAT book gotten great results?

Thanks a lot guys.
ivyleague104 is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2007, 07:42 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: US
Posts: 744
I can only tell you about the book, and let me tell you, it sucks.

The entire book has a test strategy that caters to weak test takers so they can do slightly better than average. It's not even in the same league as the Barrons books. (I have the "How to Prepare for the SAT 2007" by Barrons, and the review is good).
Coopjust is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2007, 07:45 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 687
is that better than barrons 2400?
ivyleague104 is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2007, 08:03 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: US
Posts: 744
Don't know, but the Barrons book people typically swear by in this forum when they do well is the Barron's 2400 book, I'm going to pick it up soon myself.

Last edited by Coopjust; 09-24-2007 at 08:03 PM. Reason: typos
Coopjust is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2007, 10:35 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 167
I don't know about any online courses, but PR had classes at my high school. This was when I first started studying for the SATs...

First of all, all the students there (except 1) were aiming for like 1600-1800 (as their top score). Now I'm not saying that these are bad scores to aim for at all, but because I was aiming for a 2400, these kids held me back A LOT. Second of all, the teacher was retarded. She was completely, COMPLETELY incompetent. If she took the SAT, I doubt she would have gotten a 1400 (yes I'm talking about the new one -_-). The PR tutors try to force you into using a certain method (even if your method for math takes half the time, they'll try to make you use THEIR method). In fact, self studying was about 5 - 7 times more efficient I think (no exaggeration). The only reason I stayed in the course was to take their diagnostic tests, which were actually the only helpful things the course provided.

So all in all, I don't recommend a PR tutor (don't know about online course, but I wouldn't risk that either?)
Alright, sorry - just venting my frustration.
Choi is offline   Reply   
Old 09-25-2007, 09:26 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
I took the princeton review honors course during the summer with the aim of at least reaching a 2000 on the SATs
I improved for about 100 points to a 1940
which is a huge disappointment for the price that i had paid for ($1599) and their 2100 points gaurantee.

The PR strategies did not work for me at all, especially since i needed help on the critital reading section. They encouraged us to not read the passages and just guess the theme of the passages by looking at the questions. Sorry, but i can't do that at all.
The PR teachers are also extremely young, many of them are barely college sophomores who got into schools that are pretty easy to get into. My teacher had admitted that he did not even do good on the SATs.
I dont understand how one can teach the SAT course after he had barely finished taking it, and he did not even do good on his.
cookiesgarden is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved