pseudoreal

How would it have worked regardless of the interval? Hmmmm. I take multivariable calculus and I can't ace the SAT math -- damnit.

Shizzle

Math was hard this time...

45fly6129

omg, scary- we think alike dolewhip

"great minds think alike" BUT "fools seldom differ"

pseudoreal

@Dole You are right. ****. Any curve in the math section?

ladidada94

Is there any chance that the section with the number line was experimental? Was this the same section with the three equations one?

pseudoreal

I'm pretty sure it wasn't experimental. Is there ever a curve in the math section that allows you to get 800 with missing one?

ladidada94

I don't think so. Missing one is usually 790 or 780...I wonder what missing two is. Probably 770 or 760.

tbonus

another question was like the second term if the fifth is 2x+1 = 111
=13

DoleWhip

I don't remember that question (and I think we had the same version of the test).

Toasti

Does anyone remember a question with a number line and lots of variables on it? It had the roman numerals and you had to find out which equations were always true? I think I put II and III.

pseudoreal

II and III is right.

Cardsfan

Is the number line in question the one when all the variables were either negative decimals (-.3, -.7, etc) and positive decimals (.4, .6, etc)

Toasti

Cardsfan: That was it.

Cardsfan

And do you remember what the choices were? The Roman Numerals of course

ladidada94

Anybody have a guess as to the curve?

This is my first time taking the SAT, so I don't know how relatively hard or easy it was. I think at this point I've gotten 2 wrong (ugh), but I really wanted a 750+ on math. I've taken 3 SAT IIs, and they've all been 750+, so I want my SATs to stay that way.

Ok SAT experts out there- DoleWhip and Shizzle I'm talking to you, curve predictions, please!