Toasti

>_> I feel like an idiot now. You don't even want to know what I referenced.

checkmate7

LOL. i've taken the ACT 6 times. 9/7/10/10/9...and now im waiting for this one. hopefully it will be a 10 or 11.

no_audio

can anyone give me a detailed explanation why "excessive hunting, destruction of habitat, and introduction of species" is the correct answer? i put that, but it doesn't look too parallel to me! do you guys remember the other choices?
help!

minimeigh

I took the ACT once and I'm never taking it again. 35 composite and I'm happy. Wish I could forget about that 8 on the essay though, I got all the writing questions right and then bombed that.

Sorry no_audio, didn't have that question.

wg90210

^^^ i also changed my answer from NE about the coach/consistently training question to "will qualify" or whatever the word was.

annnd i also had trouble with the snow leopard/extinction/if confirmed question...i thought the phrase should go "if confirmed...this evidence WOULD" instead of could...but if it was changed to WOULD then the meaning of the sentence would also change, so i left it as NE

minimeigh

oh, excellent wg90210, we agree on both then. how many NE's did you get overall? I only had one, but I had definite answers for all but the three that I mentioned earlier in the thread, two of which we agree on.

wg90210

i might have had only one NE, but i chose a few A for the other section, especially section 10.

minimeigh

Oh, yeah, I had some A's in that section too, I don't remember those as well because the identifying errors section always gives me the most trouble.

chuckster

does anyone remember the questions with "in which" and "to which", were these both no errors? or did they have an error? this is for the identifying error part

wg90210

i also had trouble with the europe/united states out of fearing/because it feared the soviet union.

minimeigh

ah i agree, but i thought it was because it feared. out of fearing seemed too awkward to me

wg90210

yeah out of fearing seems really awkward...but it just has to be grammatically correct.
i was hesitant in putting because it feared because of the ambiguous "it"

minimeigh

uh oh yeah, that's true. hope i didn't miss that one, i should get off this site... it's just making me worried

Combine

Anyone remember an ID error where "formerly" was underlined? It was something about how the candidate didn't "formerly" announce her decision to run in the election or something. I can't remember if I put no error of if i marked that one for a diction error. Anyone else get that? It might have been in the EXP section.

Toasti

I got that one, but I had a writing experimental.