| | |
12-03-2005, 12:58 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Notre Dame
Posts: 1,345
| US History SAT II "Official" Thread
Lets get this thread up and going. looks like the previous two arent working.
what did you think?
curve?
questions (if we're allowed to discuss them yet)
etc.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:01 PM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 590
|
yes !! ive finally found someone
i thought mehh.. i wanted a 750 plus and i dont think i got it which sux but hey?... what can you do
I think the curve isnt looking very good... its always generous i just dont think it will be too generous
questions yes lets discuss i just cant remember any im completely blanking out... hmm ill thin on it
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:05 PM
|
#3 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 590
|
oh okay birth control was margaret sanger right?
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:15 PM
|
#4 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 37
|
Gah, I hope the curve is generous.
As with the WH exam, this test seemed pretty detailed IMO.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:38 PM
|
#5 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: new york
Posts: 201
|
this test reminded me of RENT -- langston hughes, and an injunction
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:39 PM
|
#6 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 166
|
I think I got about 730-740ish
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:44 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Notre Dame
Posts: 1,345
|
i have to say, some of the culture questions like the one asking about f scott fitzgeralds common themes were more indepth in culture than princeton review.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 01:54 PM
|
#8 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 166
|
I think Barron's crapiness for the US History SAT II was proven once again... the real test is much easier than their book.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 02:05 PM
|
#9 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 169
|
Lets predict what the score curve will be...
90-80
800
80-65
790-700
65-45
690-600
45-30
590-500
30-15
490-400
etc...
don't know, never predicted a curve before, but hope this one is very generous
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 02:10 PM
|
#10 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 590
|
what was the langston hughes q and answer again?
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 02:31 PM
|
#11 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Oregon/ Duke
Posts: 742
|
Wow. Not sure what to think. I got a 660 last time without having taken a U.S. History class in high school, and this time, no clue how it went. The first 20 were super easy, but then things went south quickly. Obvious answers I thought I knew for sure weren't choices...Like Mercantilism...and some other stuff that could have gone either way. It'd be really nice if I got a 700, but that means my guess ( a lot of them) would have to be correct. I just hope I didn't bomb.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 03:12 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Notre Dame
Posts: 1,345
|
about the curve above.....does that mean that even though i get lets say 10 wrong, i still get an 800?
if so, wow, thats got to be the most lenient test ive ever taken.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 03:17 PM
|
#13 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 136
|
i left three blank. which annoyed me?
(grape rebellion or something?) never heard of that before, guess i'm naive.
but other than those 3, there were maybe a handful that i wasn't entirely positive on.
i'm hoping for 750+, woudln't be a stretch. i'd be like jumping for joy.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 03:22 PM
|
#14 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005 Location: NYC :D
Posts: 57
|
According to google, "Cesar Chavez organized grape pickers in California in 1962 into the National Farm Workers Association (NFWA)."
News to me.
|
| Reply
|
12-03-2005, 03:25 PM
|
#15 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 136
|
oh i love it, the only one i was thinking about picking.
yay.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM. |