| | |  | |
05-03-2008, 02:11 PM
|
#106 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 4
Posts: 41
| i put 7.... |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:12 PM
|
#107 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: NJ
Threads: 2
Posts: 86
| I agree with azn4eyes00 because x equals 3 is horizontal so symmetric should be vertical, shouldn't it? So y would always be negative one. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:12 PM
|
#108 | | New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 1
Posts: 21
| azn4, I'm not sure whether it was -1 or 1 but mine was identical from the question as well. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:14 PM
|
#109 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Gender: Female
Threads: 1
Posts: 52
| i got something 12 for the probability question as well.
because couldn't you have reversed 2 and 3 and make it 3 and 2 as well?
and i thought it was easier than what i imagined.. but i didn't get to finish all questions since i spent some long time on the questions that i didn't want to make stupid mistakes on lol. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:14 PM
|
#110 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 75
| gahh. i dont know why i put myself through the stress of going over all the answers. all of a sudden i dont feel i did so well lol
:/ |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:18 PM
|
#111 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 4
Posts: 41
| same here some-dude |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:18 PM
|
#112 | | New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 1
Posts: 21
| me neither I just can't wait until I see the scores. especially this one. I heard some engineering schools won't even look at students without 800 on mathII. And I am so freaking out. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:18 PM
|
#113 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 75
| fivewinks, i believe the question said that the 3 always precedes the 2 (or 2 precedes the 3), but not both.
therefore i think the answer was just 6...
..i hope. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:20 PM
|
#114 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Gender: Not Saying
Threads: 2
Posts: 44
| fivewinks: It said that 2 was immediately followed by 3, so you treat "23" as one digit.
Wait, can we return to the last question? Did you guys get .932?!
Also, the one with the p^2*q^5*r^something, wasn't it B? Because that was the least one where you could just cancel out the denominator/divisor and you would just get the pqr multiplied together which is an integer? I'm confused. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:22 PM
|
#115 | | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Threads: 4
Posts: 13
| what about the triangle with the sides 5,6, and 7? i think i got something like 112... or something...
do you remmeber that question?? |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:22 PM
|
#116 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 60
| um X=3 is verticle? |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:23 PM
|
#117 | | New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 1
Posts: 20
| heyli: yeah, x=3 was vertical. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:24 PM
|
#118 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 75
| goodatlife, use law of cosines and you should have gotten 78 degrees |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:25 PM
|
#119 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 60
| right, therefore, the line symmetric to X=3 should be Y=some number, in this case = -1 and its horizontal. so shouldnt the anwser of f(7) still be -1? because X=-1 and X=7 are on the same line. |
| |
05-03-2008, 02:28 PM
|
#120 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Gender: Female
Threads: 1
Posts: 52
| haha i must've mis-remembered law of cos b/c i used it and kept getting a smaller number; but i chose the number that was closest, which was 78 degrees. yay!
but dang it; i was really thought i got that probability question right...
what was the standard deviation one? i know that if the graph is uniform, than it should have SD of 0, but there were 2 graphs that were uniform. |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM. |