| | |  | |
10-10-2009, 11:29 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 407
| October 2009 SAT II - Math Level 1
Anyone here take Math I? All my friends took Math II - I definitely felt a little inferior..
We can't discuss specifics yet, but what are your general thoughts?
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 12:21 PM
|
#2 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 34
|
LOL Noob math 1!
only kidding. just posting b/c its lonely in here.
I took 2, and kind of wish i took 1. IIC is more complex, but has a generous curve. (Which means math I is NOT inferior b/c you barely get a curve) I would have preferred the Math 1 b/c i did 0 preparation and knew none of the material.
g luck!
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 12:41 PM
|
#3 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 38
|
Math I seemed a lot easier than the diagnostic tests I had taken to study for it. I kinda regretted not taking Math II after seeing the material on Math I, but my friend was banging his head on his desk when he finished Math II, and he's probably the biggest math person at my school. Or at least he acts like he is. Anyway, I'm really hoping for an 800, but I'll settle for a 750+. I might attempt to take Math II as I'm not afraid of the SAT Math Subject Tests anymore as a result of my experience today. Oh, and having a TI-89 Titanium makes the math portions of any SAT (Reasoning or Subject Test) much easier. I'm surprised that the Collegeboard lets people use them on the tests.
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 12:49 PM
|
#4 | | New Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 29
|
I took both Math I and Math II today. (Idk if thats a good strategy, but w/e).
I was actually surprised by some of the difficult questions on Math I. Math II was still harder but I would say that its more advanced math, but not necessarily harder questions. (E.g. Math I asked hard questions on lower level math)
I'm not sure which one I will do better on, since the curve is so tough on Math I.
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 01:49 PM
|
#5 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 77
|
I took both- math I and II. I was definitely easier...
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 01:57 PM
|
#6 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: CA
Posts: 310
|
Math I has a vicious curve. You're basically not allowed to miss any if you want an 800. Also, I know a lot of people in my area don't bother to take Math I because UCs don't accept it. The only guy I know who took both got an 800 on Math II and a 600 something on Math I. And he's quite good at Math.
I'm considering taking it with Lit and Bio M in November just to round out all the tests.
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 03:13 PM
|
#7 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 43
|
what did you guys get for the cylinder question...
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 05:02 PM
|
#8 | | New Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 23
|
Good luck everyone!
|
| Reply
|
10-10-2009, 09:38 PM
|
#9 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 407
|
for the cylinder question i got 72pi - if it's rotated along the rectangle's longer side, that becomes the height, and the other side of 3 would be the radius, so
V = pi r^2 h
= pi(9)(8)
=72pi
...right? ahh
|
| Reply
|
10-11-2009, 08:09 AM
|
#10 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 36
|
ahhh. but it's (1/3)pi r^2 h. they gave the formua at the beginning
|
| Reply
|
10-11-2009, 11:22 AM
|
#11 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 407
| |
| Reply
|
10-11-2009, 09:24 PM
|
#12 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 62
|
Did anyone else get 36 for the square overlap
|
| Reply
|
10-12-2009, 08:42 AM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: 561
Posts: 1,674
|
i did noname
|
| Reply
|
10-12-2009, 09:13 PM
|
#14 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 120
|
I didn't even attempt the square overlap
but for the rectangle --> cylinder one I also got 72pi
Math I was just an extra for me.. only went in to do lit and bio e
|
| Reply
|
10-15-2009, 04:30 AM
|
#15 | | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
|
how many could i do wrong but still get 750?
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM. |