bbtitle]
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

Go Back   College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Colleges and Universities > CC Top Universities > Stanford University > Stanford 2013
New User

Welcome to College Confidential, the leading college-bound community on the Web!
 
Here you'll find hundreds of pages of articles about choosing a college, getting into the college you want, how to pay for it, and much more. You'll also find the Web's busiest discussion community related to college admissions, and our College Visits section!

You are currently viewing the site as a guest.
Registration is simple and easy, and provides full site access.

Join our FREE community:

  • Post and reply to topics
  • Talk privately with other members
  • Participate in polls
  • View less ads
  • Remove this welcome message

 REGISTER NOW

Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! College Visits
»NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
CC Resources for Stanford University
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2009, 06:35 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 364
Stanford Physics course.

Stanford physics courses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

It seems that stanford has 2 intro course series for engineers in physics: one is the 40's series, which is the basic calculus based physics, and the 60's series, which is the more advanced intro series.

If I plan to major in engineering but minor in physics, which one is advisable to do? I'm currently enrolled in Physics C, although our class is really easy, and Calc BC. I'm also studying on multivariate calc at home.

1. Which books are used by the 60's series?
2. Is the 60's series equivalent in difficulty to the 8.012/8.022 (advanced mechanics/electricity for freshman) at MIT? The advanced intro courses at MIT uses the Kleppner and Kolenkow Introduction to mechanics and Griffith Electrodynamics.
3. Which class has the better curve? What will my peers be like in the 60's series? (mostly physics majors with some engineering, mostly engineering majors, mostly olympiad people...)
4. If I plan to take a course in Quantum and Classical (maybe even statistical) mechanics, is the 60's series a more appropriate intro?

Thanks for your help.

Faraday.
faraday is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2009, 11:34 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 31
>>If I plan to major in engineering but minor in physics, which one is advisable to do? I'm >>currently enrolled in Physics C, although our class is really easy, and Calc BC. I'm also >>studying on multivariate calc at home.

Either works. Take the class that interests you and that you are prepared for.

>>1. Which books are used by the 60's series?

They used Advanced Mechanics by Taylor and Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffith. I heard that they also used Purcell.

2. Is the 60's series equivalent in difficulty to the 8.012/8.022 (advanced mechanics/electricity for freshman) at MIT? The advanced intro courses at MIT uses the Kleppner and Kolenkow Introduction to mechanics and Griffith Electrodynamics.
These classes are probably similar.

3. Which class has the better curve? What will my peers be like in the 60's series? (mostly physics majors with some engineering, mostly engineering majors, mostly olympiad people...)
There will be a lot of olympiad people with some engineers. The grading can be very generous in the 60 series to compensate for the stiff competition.

4. If I plan to take a course in Quantum and Classical (maybe even statistical) mechanics, is the 60's series a more appropriate intro?

Either the 40 series or the 60 series will do.
StanEE is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Copyright 2001-2009, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved