College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Transfer Students
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2012, 08:23 PM   #16
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,446
This is apparently typical, accounting for the "hellish" workload widely reported:
Quote:
At most colleges and universities, the material covered in Econ 201 would be taught over a full year, after another introductory course. That means that you will, in one semester, be at a point that most economics students take three semesters to reach! Clearly, this course is very fast paced.
Economics 201
vonlost is offline   Reply   
Old 10-21-2012, 01:42 AM   #17
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 29
Honestly, I just don't get your motivation here. I'd love to discuss the quality of Reed classes, esp. for OP's benefit, but you are arguing what is "widely reported" and I am coming from over 2 years on campus--and it's a very, very small campus. You get to know the school very well.

The workload typically is "hellish" and "fast pace," that is true. But you are representing the classes as somehow 'accelerated' versions of 'normal' classes, and I find that to be very misleading. Reed classes on the whole are not 'accelerated,' despite what that 2-year-old website has lead you to believe. I concede that the Intro Econ at Reed may cover much of what is covered in multiple classes at some other schools. Same w/r/t the Intro science class I took. However, Reed classes are not really directly comparable to other universities' classes (and by that I'm not saying that Reed is somehow 'incomparable' as in 'exceptional'). Reed is extremely theory-based on the whole, from Poli Sci to Art History. And while some classes may seem very fast-paced, others dredge slowly through an entire body of work and its whole minutiae.

Listen, I'm exhausted so I hope this makes sense, but you don't seem like you know much about Reed beyond the internet, or at least you haven't let on that you do. Let's skip the "apparently"s and "reported" facts, because that won't help the OP decide. The OP, like me, has actually attended the school in question.......
austonian is offline   Reply   
Old 10-21-2012, 01:46 AM   #18
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 29
Speaking of, bogbeast, I thought of something you could do. I interacted with one of the Deans very closely in a work capacity and in my transferring (/leave-taking) process. Contact Bruce Smith at Reed if you wanna talk candidly. He is a very down-to-Earth person who manages to avoid both Reed exceptionalism ("You must go to Reed") and snobbery ("Maybe you don't belong here").....both of which I encountered when discussing my potential transfer. Good luck.
austonian is offline   Reply   
Old 10-21-2012, 02:16 AM   #19
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 29
Speaking of Reed exceptionalism.
austonian is offline   Reply   
Old 12-29-2012, 08:45 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 31
@austonian I'm 99% sure vonlost is a Reed alumnus and a moderator for the Reed College forum so he probably knows a thing or two. So lay off a bit (and I mean this in the nicest way possible).

I, too, am a recent Reed alum and came out of it loving Reed and being grateful for the education I received. Since this post has mostly discussed its negatives, I want to offer a little balance. I should probably mention I was a transfer student, and at various points in my academic career I have attended a community college, a very large public university, a relatively unknown LAC, and Reed. So I have a little perspective on how Reed may compare to other colleges (though I don't have any firsthand knowledge of Hunter).

I think we can all agree that the workload is very difficult. For some, that is a huge drawback and impairs other things that they equally prioritize (social life, activities and internships, etc). For me, it was daunting but very exciting, and I was at a time in my life where I wanted to devote 23/7 to school (an hour for sleep ). The things Reed offered that the other schools didn't was challenging me to my limits (especially during my thesis), amazing personal relationships with my professors, interesting classes that really dug deep into the course content, and a campus culture eager to learn. I couldn't get away with ********ting my way through class, nor did I want to. I learned how to speak up and share my ideas, how to dissect arguments from various angles, how to wed idea and execution. I got a job directly related to my field within months of graduating (without any connections or wealthy parents, btw). The non-vocation/non-practicality of Reed can be tempered by outside jobs and internships, working for your profs, starting student groups for the things you are passionate about, etc. I have no idea what my GPA is and it doesn't really matter. Maybe it will if I will apply to grad school, but I am hopeful that Reed's "cache among grad programs" will win out.

I don't disagree that the student body is somewhat homogenous, that conference style classes aren't for everyone, that the first year is tough, that your GPA will suck compared to students at other schools, and especially that Reed isn't for everyone. It's not! Going into massive amounts of debt for a BA is rarely worth it from an investment standpoint. Only attending a school for some 'prestigious' name is silly, you should attend a college because it's a good fit for you. What people said about being an outstanding fish in a mediocre pond has merit... but desiring to be in a community passionate about learning also has merit. If the OP can achieve his short and long term goals by going to Hunter College and save thousands of dollars, more power to 'em. But it just depends on what your individual priorities are, what's worth it and what's not to you. Personally, I had to think long and hard about why I was going to college and what I wanted to get out of it, which is what spurred me to leave a school that was fine in many regards and attend Reed.

In the end, all four of us (OP, vonlost, austonian, & me) have attended Reed at some point, and all four of us have come away with very different experiences and therefore varying opinions of Reed. Obviously, what's right for me or what's right for someone else isn't necessarily what's right for you... and I think that is something the OP is going to have to decide largely on his/her own.

Last edited by SHolmies; 12-29-2012 at 08:56 PM.
SHolmies is offline   Reply   
Old 12-30-2012, 02:33 AM   #21
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,446
For the record, I am a Reed alum parent, associated with Reed since 2005, and have a number contacts with Reed staff who graciously answer questions. Years ago I even audited a Reed econ course that was tough!
vonlost is offline   Reply   
Old 12-30-2012, 05:04 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: PDX
Posts: 31
Thanks for setting the record straight!
SHolmies is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved