College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > Transfer Students > UC Transfers
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2008, 03:18 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UC Berkeley
Threads: 16
Posts: 210
Hope for the best and prepare for the worst. There's nothing else we can do.
RedTapePatrol is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:52 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USC
Gender: Female
Threads: 24
Posts: 2,259
That does suck for borderline people. Everyone should have a shot to go to a good school. Bummer.
Woman.Of.Troy is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 12:49 PM   #18
jfk
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Threads: 24
Posts: 378
Honestly, I don't think it's as bad as people think. Only those real borderline people may be affected but it's nothing drastic where someone who would normally get in would be denied because of the budget cuts. As for what the definition of borderline is, it may come down to those applicants who get decided based on their personal statement, or it may not. No one knows for sure but I think everyone is overreacting a bit.
jfk is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 12:53 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Threads: 11
Posts: 149
If it's meant to be, it's meant to be.
killer22 is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 01:13 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Gender: Male
Threads: 27
Posts: 659
UCLA Undergrad Admissions: Profile of Admitted Transfer Students, Fall 2004

^^a very general transfer statistics page for UCLA admits in 04 (2004 was the last time the UC's had to cut their admissions significantly).

New UCLA Admissions Data Shows Significant Increase in Academic Quality for Students Admitted for Fall 2004 Freshman Class / UCLA Newsroom

^^article on freshman admissions in 2004. Also mentions a budget cut.
poppin3000 is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 02:17 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Threads: 86
Posts: 1,048
even though its not as bad as people thing, i am still against cutting school budget. The california school system is going down in quality and witht his, they wil just make it worse.
AdamantineX is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 02:54 PM   #22
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Threads: 12
Posts: 515
Hey AdamantineX, I know what you mean. My fiance is a 6th grade teacher at a California public school. I will say though...studies have shown (and I wish I could find it to post) that while spending is increased, test scores stayed flat. It's been proven that throwing more money at schools changes nothing. But of course, we're talking more about K-12 here...it's not like they do research and what not.

Anyway, I've faced something like this situation before. When I went up for my promotion to staff sergeant, promotion rates had been pretty high over previous years but in my year it dropped 20%...and we knew this prior to finding out if we got promoted or not. I still never had any doubt in my mind that I made it. And I'll tell you, it felt pretty good to be able to say you got promoted the year they cut the rates by 20%. To me, it will be the same thing when I get my acceptance letters.

Good luck to all!
Edward04 is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 02:57 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Threads: 5
Posts: 39
I find the truth hard to swallow, but most of time is. With these budget cuts you'll also cause an excess amount of transfer students that will reapply for next year. Freshman's who don't get in will more than likely head toward CC's and thereby over follow CC's.
This will only create a tsunami wave of applications for transfer in the years to come.
motul is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 03:11 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Gender: Male
Threads: 35
Posts: 1,184
Most freshman applicants won't go the CC route, they almost always go with a safety school, etc; and transfers are the same way. Thus, I don't think a wave of applicants will result from the cuts. Also, it is important to remember that the UCs had nothing to do with the cut, the source lies in Sacramento, but that's another story all together.
Ektaylor is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 05:06 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Threads: 18
Posts: 193
i'm curious to see what the UC Davis rep has to say
officespace is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 06:27 PM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Threads: 63
Posts: 757
Ha! what if it becomes so competitive that Cal and UCLA starts admitting only students with 3.8+ and amazing ECs. They might even become the next Ivys( i.e institutions with very high class exclusivity).
student14x is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 07:07 PM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Threads: 5
Posts: 213
I was thinking the very same thing.

All these people talking about it only affecting "borderline applicants", what will they say when a borderline applicant is anyone below a 4.0?

On another note, riverside starts notifications next Saturday... anyone else excited?
anchor is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 07:27 PM   #28
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Threads: 13
Posts: 377
^no, im not excited.

i think ucla and berkeley have already become super competitive and they are already next to Ivies. berkeley ranking is like 20 or something?

anyways, i hope that they will take in account ECs and personal statements more with the boarderline people.
Guyy is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:20 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Threads: 20
Posts: 1,135
I mean really how many applicant spots can they really cut?
Thedude44 is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 11:31 PM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SoCal
Gender: Male
Threads: 0
Posts: 73
Well ,due to the state's cutbacks, not to mention the fact that they have just built the brand new campus, It's only logical that they will bump kids who would have quallified at UCLA ,UCB last year. I believe this trend will continue in the future unfortunately.
TerpDad is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0