I am also in Carlisle's course. And he does speak about things that are sometimes unrelated to the course. But from what I can gather, all the readings, lectures, and discussions hinges on the understanding of how we. categorize gender/sexuality/ and categorizing itself. Hints from my TA gave was to read most of the readings relating to gender and how they came to categorize it.
My TA does not know if Carlisle will give a essay final exam or a mix between multiple choice + essay. But I will most likely go with the former on an essay.
The course itself is just trying to enrich us with how we go about judging others and criticize whether the assignment of gender, sexuality, etc... Is effective or should it be something deeper.
Again this is my own interpretation of the course. I'm going to ask this question for my discussion next week

.
Hope you get unlost!