Hi guys. I feel somewhat like a leech for never having posted/registered until today but i'll disregard the feeling so I can continue to leech and have my first post be a question for myself
I've gotten into several LACs, Amherst and Williams being the ones I'm considering the most, as well as into Chicago, and I plan on visiting the east (and midwest) in a couple weeks. But I just gotta ask some questions here.
I really want to be in a big city, i.e. Chicago. But I've heard that the five-college atmosphere isn't too rural-feeling at amherst and williams redeems itself for the community's discounted snowboarding ticket prices

And I guess the rural feel isn't too bad if four years is compared against 22 years of life, 18 in L.A. and Las Vegas. Comments?
But my primary concern is on how much I will get out of whichever college I choose. I know Chicago is reputed to be more intense, but for every cramp of my fingers, will I get back in return the same amount of intellectual reward? I mean the lacs make a compelling argument. Days ago, I was set on Chicago. Strong liberal arts education, in a big city, and.. well that's enough for me. Or was enough. I'm sure Chicago has plenty of small classes/seminars, but how does the number compare against amherst/williams? Or the amount of attention given to students by faculty? Is it more individual in Chicago and is that better? I have no idea for a major, no specific goal, I just want to learn stuff and enjoy every moment of it. Which will provide me that?