| | |
CC Resources for University of Pennsylvania
 | |
04-15-2009, 08:17 PM
|
#1 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 33
| How many Sat II subject tests should I take?
On Penn's website, it says that they require 2 Sat II subject test. So my question is, is it better to be safe and take an extra test to make it 3? Also, are there any recommended Sat II tests that should be taken, or do they place equal weight on all of the tests?
|
| Reply
|
04-15-2009, 11:28 PM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 505
|
You really have to take 3+ I took 4 and got 700+ on each.
|
| Reply
|
04-16-2009, 06:31 PM
|
#3 | | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
|
I'm fairly sure they just look at the top two scores.
|
| Reply
|
04-25-2009, 11:07 PM
|
#4 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 46
|
i took 3 and got 800 for all 3
i'm here thinking there's no definite answer but we should be looking at quality over quantity (i.e. rather sit 2 and get 800s than sit 4 and get 600s)
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 01:08 AM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 327
|
Take 3 and make sure Math 2 is one of them
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 01:54 AM
|
#6 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 67
|
i only took 2 (literature and us history), and i got in the 600s, and i got into wharton..so anything can happen, really...
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 12:29 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: --->Penn '13
Posts: 2,074
|
I took six (too many really...but all made a sort of sense at the time). My best two were my last, taken around AP time (750, 800) corresponding to APs I took. I also took my language SAT II, because at Penn, you can get exempted if you have a 650 or above (at least in Latin for me). I'd recommend taking two in soph year (so you don't worry about *needing* to do well; you also will have more time to study) and two in junior year. Also, if you're taking a special language exam that isn't offered all the time (ie, Latin is offered only 2x/yr), you might consider taking that before admissions decisions.
p.s. I got into penn and columbia, so...
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 03:45 PM
|
#8 | | Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 327
| Quote: |
i only took 2 (literature and us history), and i got in the 600s, and i got into wharton..so anything can happen, really...
| I wouldn't recommend that unless you are also a URM
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 04:16 PM
|
#9 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 46
|
Hope i don't offend anyone by saying this but how can you get less than 700 for SAT II?
Everyone i know who applied from New Zealand had 750+ for all their subject tests
I really think you should take subjects which you enjoy cos you really want to notch up the marks and show that you are above the rest. just take some ap classes and study hard (AP is are also rigged; everyone who sat aps form nz and aus got 5's for all their subjects including me and i guess-worked 2 of the 5 free response Q's for physics)
i got into penn, brown, cmu, northwestern, duke, cornell, so...
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#10 | | Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 500
|
Take at least the minimum required by admissions. If you do not perform as successfully as you had hoped you would, take more. They say that they only look at your top scores. There are advantages to taking a group of tests that span multiple disciplines (ie. a math/science, a humanities, a language, etc.), but there are also advantages to taking and excelling in one area, especially if you are trying to highlight your strengths for a special program at the school in question.
|
| Reply
|
04-26-2009, 08:22 PM
|
#11 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 126
|
i took two [us history and math I] and got in the 650's and I got into CAS.
who knows what'll happen?
|
| Reply
|
05-02-2009, 01:43 PM
|
#12 | | New Member
Join Date: May 2009 Location: NJ
Posts: 2
|
if you apply with a major, im pretty sure they look at the subject tests that relate to that field. otherwise, they probably just look at your top 2.
i was accepted as a chem major and took 4 SAT IIs - math 1, math 2, chemistry, and US history. i got 700+ on all except history, but since im not pursuing that it really didnt mean much
|
| Reply
|
05-08-2009, 03:02 PM
|
#13 | | New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NJ
Posts: 21
|
You want to have 3 good scores. I took 4 only because I did bad on my first one.
|
| Reply
|
05-08-2009, 05:52 PM
|
#14 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Quaker.
Posts: 420
|
Take math, lit, and a science.
|
| Reply
|
05-09-2009, 07:00 PM
|
#15 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 33
|
I personally took 6 and got 800s on all, but truth being SAT lls are really only important if your school is [not so good]. You see, a school where everyone gets 4.0s is just asking to turn out a slew of applicants with straight 600s on SAT lls. At my school (Phillips Exeter) everyone is actually smart and will get 1 or 2 800s, so I needed to get 6 800s to prove that I am a superior applicant.
So in short..... if your school is
1. Grade inflated with a lot of 4.0s ---- get a couple high 700s at least.
2. Grade deflated------ get 800s to prove your grades aren't a reality
3. Poor/URM dominated school ---- get mid 600s to show that you are average (nationally) and thus additionally display that you are smarter that the average applicant at the school.
Last edited by Momwaitingfornew; 05-10-2009 at 11:15 AM.
Reason: To remove offensive adjective
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM. |