|
One crude measure is simply the percentage of foreign language majors who graduate (or add in "area studies" - at some schools, "area studies" are language majors who take more culture/history classes in the language rather than literature ones - Smith is an example; in other schools, these are mostly 'ethnic studies' majors). At any rate, it is a crude measure because it reflects major interests of the students, not necessarily quality. Other quality measures would be number of upper-class electives actually offered each year (don't count classes in the catalogue, count classes actually offered each semester), or number of faculty who are not language instructors or "visiting professors" - you can check these out for yourself. But the number of majors, though crude, is also a good measure because it likely or often reflects the critical mass needed for language tables, language halls or houses, film series, or top-flight study abroad advising or programs.
Anyhow, the common data sets of a few schools show the following (the first percentage is that of language majors, the number in parenthesis represents area/ethnic studies majors):
Smith - 13.49% (7.61%)
Middlebury - 11% (6.%)
Amherst - 10.6% (6.2%)
Swarthmore - 8.4% (0.5%)
Macalester 7.7% (2.6%)
Williams - 5% (4%)
|