bbtitle]
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

Go Back   College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Ivy League > Yale University
New User

Welcome to College Confidential, the leading college-bound community on the Web!
 
Here you'll find hundreds of pages of articles about choosing a college, getting into the college you want, how to pay for it, and much more. You'll also find the Web's busiest discussion community related to college admissions, and our College Visits section!

You are currently viewing the site as a guest.
Registration is simple and easy, and provides full site access.

Join our FREE community:

  • Post and reply to topics
  • Talk privately with other members
  • Participate in polls
  • View less ads
  • Remove this welcome message

 REGISTER NOW

Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! College Visits
»NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
CC Resources for Yale University
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2009, 06:19 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
I am bumping this thread up because I think it contains information that some current browsers may have missed and is even more pertinent now as applicants decide when they want to apply to schools. Furthermore, the thread housing the posts has been lost behind many pages on the College Admissions forum.

I am still willing to answer any questions! I'm not biased in a relevant way yet; my turn comes up next year.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 08:38 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
Bumping again because I think it's a valuable resource for those who find no significant fault in the methodology.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 09:30 PM   #48
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26
Great analysis, Silverturtle. You are a whiz at this statistical stuff. One follow-up question: Assuming an unhooked candidate is over the apparent SAT I/GPA "threshhold" (for this purpose, let's call it 2300/3.9 gpa) what are the odds of acceptance based on the data you analyzed? I'm assuming for this purpose that no information is available about the subjective elements (EC's, essays, recs, etc) to distinguish one candidate in the "pool" from another. Does the answer differ by white vs ORM? You've probably answered these question already in one of the threads, but, on quick review, I couldn't find it.
STMoore is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 09:39 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
That's a good question; about 40% of those who passed the "threshold" were accepted.

Nonetheless, I think the most important conclusions that can be drawn are more about what one must have in order to get accepted early. The sample size doesn't make conclusions about the chances of this viable group very convincingly.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 09:47 PM   #50
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 26
Yes, and it also occurs to me that the cc bias towards overachievers (as against the overall population of candidates over the threshhold) may particularly skew the % acceptance statistic. In other words, cc participants in the "pool" may be more likely as a group to have outstanding subjective elements relative to their non cc counterparts. On the other hand, perhaps the reverse is true, since spending a lot of time of cc may get in the way of developing outstanding EC's.
STMoore is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 09:49 PM   #51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112


Your comments about the perhaps unrepresentative strength of the applicants' subjective elements may be true, which is why the data should be used only in determining thresholds; the subjective elements' relative strength is likely not so great as to meaningfully skew the practical threshold.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 09:53 PM   #52
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 81
Assuming that my objective elements (2370 SAT, 3.95 GPA), are up to par with the SCEA number, would it be more advantageous to apply early or during regular decision?

I've heard mixed messages, with saying that SCEA is best only for hooked applicants (which I'm certainly not...middle class ORM) and others saying that SCEA is best for those with 'different' subjective elements as compared to most Yale applicants.

Which is true?
I have fairly 'unique' ECs (A lot of political/debate stuff and math/science stuff), and otherwise stereotypical Asian stats. The only thing I think that sets me apart is my interest in politics.
Vaeliant is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:10 PM   #53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sin city
Posts: 1,226
do meeee!!:

3.9uw GPA , 4.0 when you discount that stupid grade in PE(electives kill)
2290 sat I, 2360 sat II
5 5 5 5 5

and here's the iffy part:
female(yay) and chinese (nay) and engineering (nay or yay)
pigs_at_sea is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:18 PM   #54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
Vaeliant,

As you'll see from the results, Asian applicants with stats on your level were accepted; it's definately possible.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:20 PM   #55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
Pigs,

You've got a decent chance. However, your SAT may be a little low: none of the Asian applicants in the study were accepted with an SAT score below 2300.

(And yes, only on CC could I call a score at approximately the 99.7 percentile too low.)
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:23 PM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sin city
Posts: 1,226
^lol fo shizzle
thanks for the honesty
pigs_at_sea is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:24 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,112
^ I have trouble believing that ten points makes or breaks an applicant. Alas, the data support it.
silverturtle is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:40 PM   #58
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Did you consider blocking the academic stats (GPA, SAT) by school type? I have a 3.80 (I think eight B/B+'s) at a rigorous prep school (but 2360 single sitting) and am an ORM--is that an absolute killer?
Pastel is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:43 PM   #59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sin city
Posts: 1,226
^I love you you use statistics terminology, ex: "blocking"
pigs_at_sea is offline   Reply   
Old 11-04-2009, 10:48 PM   #60
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
I can has chancez?

2320 (720 in math), 800, 770, 750 SAT 2s
102 GPA
5 5 5

White male from NJ?
xatuuatx is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SCEA Countdown thread. sadface Stanford University 0 12-07-2008 09:14 PM
Why dont start a helpful thread race64 University of Pennsylvania 4 11-10-2008 01:23 PM
When you post a very helpful thread reply InquilineKea College Confidential Cafe 3 06-21-2007 12:03 AM
SCEA Countdown Thread fuzzylogic Stanford University 367 12-15-2006 03:15 PM
everyone on this thread seems so much more helpful with chances mysticpizza University of Chicago 5 07-16-2006 02:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Copyright 2001-2009, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved