| | |
CC Resources for Yale University
 | |
10-29-2009, 09:43 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
| completely screwed with my sat subject scores?
u.s. history -- 710
literature -- (670 originally), 730 retaken
taking biology and retaking lit in december. not sure how well i'll do on bio; i'm gonna study but i haven't taken bio since fall of last year. and maybe trying to add spanish but i'm not even done with my second year yet. :-/
but as they stand, does it look like i'm completely screwed?
|
| Reply
|
10-29-2009, 11:06 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,673
|
No, you aren't. Those are very good scores. The lit score is good--that's a hard test. Why would you retake that rather than history? And why would you take the Spanish test?
|
| Reply
|
10-29-2009, 11:31 AM
|
#3 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
thank you! well, i took the u.s. history test right after taking the ap u.s. history class and test last year so i figure that's the best i'm going to do on it. i mean, i got a 5 on the ap u.s. history test and right after i get a 710 on the sat ii, so i figure now--months after taking the class--it's unlikely i would do better unless i spent a ton of time restudying (but i was already in the process of studying hard for the ap test when i took the sat ii...) i mean, do you think the 710 looks really bad and maybe i should consider retaking?
as for the spanish, i think i might be able to do good but i'm not sure. i'm gonna try to find some practice tests and see.
and for lit, i know there are probably a lot of people who got 750+ and i think i might be able to if i retake it. :-/
|
| Reply
|
10-29-2009, 11:33 AM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,673
|
It's really hard to say how you'll do if you take lit again--usually there are diminishing returns. I take your point on history.
|
| Reply
|
10-29-2009, 08:52 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
is there a particular reason that there are often diminishing returns if you take a test more than twice?
and even if i did worse, wouldn't yale still only consider the highest score i got?
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 12:32 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,673
| Quote: |
is there a particular reason that there are often diminishing returns if you take a test more than twice?
| I think College Board simply states that this is the typical result--that you might improve, but the improvement tends to be less each time. It might be different if you prep a lot more, I suppose. The question is whether there is something better to do with your time.
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 08:42 PM
|
#7 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
so they think you are likely to improve but maybe not by much? i still think it's worth it to retake it then. even a 750 looks a lot better than a 730, no?
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 11:58 PM
|
#8 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 44
|
I think that you are right about not retaking the US History Exam, but I also got a 730 on the Lit subject test which I took in June and although it is not 750 + I think it is good enough. There is really no point if you are going to spend all that time studying for Lit and raising your score by only a little when you could be focusing on the bio test and getting an 800 on it.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 12:18 AM
|
#9 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 46
|
they aren't bad scores, but they won't really help you either.
have you taken the ACT? you can send that instead.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 09:38 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,673
| Quote: |
even a 750 looks a lot better than a 730, no?
| I would say no--it only looks a little better.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 10:26 AM
|
#11 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
@ collegestress, i'm not really going to study for the lit retake. there isn't really a good way to study for that test anyway, imo. it seems to stem more from one's inherent ability to interpret literature and not from memorizing facts, so i will definitely be studying more for the bio anyway and will probably just retake the lit to see if i can improve my score at all. maybe this time i'll get ALL passages i understand completely (on the last one, there was one passage i was iffy about and it's probably what cost me.)
@ fraudulence, i took the act and did really poorly on it (27). i'm definitely sending my sat and sat ii's instead. :P
so even if--by some chance--i do WORSE on my lit retake, yale will still only consider the highest i got (730, if it may be), right?
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 10:30 AM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,673
|
I guess if you have to go take an SAT II anyway, there's no particular harm in taking lit again. It might look a bit odd to some adcoms that you would take that particular test three times.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 10:34 AM
|
#13 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
really? :-/ the first time i took it, i didn't finish about half of the questions and so i got a 670. the second time, i luckily got through the whole thing with 5 minutes left over!  but hmmm...if it would look weird...*sigh*
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 02:24 PM
|
#14 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 76
|
Definitely take a Spanish practice test before you consider taking it. Around here, students have had 5 years of Spanish before they take it, or are native speakers with a couple years of classes to improve their grammar and writing skills.
I think the two scores you have are fine-no need to re-take Lit, just prepare well for Bio.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 02:27 PM
|
#15 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 518
|
yeah, i heard that people who are in AP spanish literature even thought it was hard, so i'm not taking it after all. :P
and while i won't really study for lit any more (cuz there really isn't a good way to study for lit, is there?), i'll probably retake it just for the hell of it and see if i improve...
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM. |