Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.

Full Send or No Send Soccer?

145679

Replies to: Full Send or No Send Soccer?

  • sushirittosushiritto Registered User Posts: 3,322 Senior Member
    edited May 8
    There's an old adage that "it takes 6 weeks to get into shape and 2 weeks to get out of it." Out here in CA, cross country is a fall sport and track is a spring sport. So, you have plenty of time. Or go with soccer. Or just focus on school.

    Some "old guy" once said “Success occurs when opportunity meets preparation.” It's really up to you.

  • MidwestmomofboysMidwestmomofboys Registered User Posts: 3,959 Senior Member
    A young person who puts in time on the treadmill, the track, doing interval training, can get back into shape very quickly.
  • MYOS1634MYOS1634 Registered User Posts: 41,530 Senior Member
    edited May 8
    Why don't you go and try a practice or two with the team, see if it's fun, if you get along with them, and if you do well?
    You could continue soccer with the HS, for the love of the sport, and practice running seriously (conditioning, weight lifting, jogging/running, etc).
    What about discus, javelin...?
    Anyway, if you can get back into shape, you could have an athletic hook without having to play DA/Club soccer :)
    Two days ago I saw the interview with a young man who had been training for the 400M and switched one day to the 50m dash and broke a national record....
  • squ1rrelsqu1rrel Registered User Posts: 271 Junior Member
    @MYOS1634 Lol discus or javelin...have you seen my arms? They're probably skinnier than a javelin.

    Ok probably not but I'd stick with running. 800m is my best event IMO.
  • MYOS1634MYOS1634 Registered User Posts: 41,530 Senior Member
    Yup, but you still have time to test everything and figure out what your "best event" would be.
    And you can be BOTH a recruited athlete (if good at track) AND a HS soccer player. :) One in the Fall (+ extra running) and one in the Spring.
  • twoinanddonetwoinanddone Registered User Posts: 21,856 Senior Member
    I was thinking the same thing - those discus throwers are HUGE.

    Track and field scholarships are sliced and diced fairly thinly and while you may only want the hook to get into a school, those aren't always easy to get either.
  • politepersonpoliteperson Registered User Posts: 258 Junior Member
    Track is a great sport, and by all means you should run if you want to. However, I’d push back a bit against the notion that a 5 minute mile suggests a future recruitable track athlete. It’s possible but unlikely in my experience, especially for one who doesn’t enjoy running. 5 minute untrained freshman guys are fairly common and it’s tough to predict which ones will improve enough to make varsity, let alone be recruited. Do it if you want to. Don’t do it because you think you’ll be recruited.

    @sushiritto the mile isn’t contested at many HS meets, which is why you’re finding few guys under 4:30. The 1600 is the relevant event to look at (except for a few states, which contest the 1500).
  • MYOS1634MYOS1634 Registered User Posts: 41,530 Senior Member
    I'm very much in favor of freshmen trying things without college goals. So what if @squ1rrel won't be winning anything throwing the discus or the javelin? If he has fun he can totally try every event before deciding on one. :)
    OP is taking calculus as a freshman and is already thinking of taking way too many AP's. He should have fun a little bit.

    @sq1rrel seems to want the athletic edge to get into MIT. You can look at MIT's recruited athletes and see whether that's even an achievable goal. But to get into MIT, developing tech skills, applying them to help others, and being a stellar student, is more important than being a top athlete.
  • sushirittosushiritto Registered User Posts: 3,322 Senior Member
    edited May 9
    @politeperson The OP gave us a mile time, not a 1,600 time, so I went with what I was given. But I do understand that 1,600 is what most run today.
    My track times are:
    100m: 13
    200m: 27
    400m: Sub 60
    800m: Sub 2:20
    1 mile: 5:04
    5k: 19:20 (kinda slow, only ran once, not very useful for soccer anyway)

    For your consideration:

    Using just the given elite example, the MIT Track Recruiting Standards:

    800m = 1:56
    1,600m = 4:22

    https://scripts.mit.edu/~hwtaylor/recruiting/recruitingstandards.php

    Really, OP, do whatever you makes you happiest. You've got potential. And with REAL coaching and training, it may take you some where. I've coached recruitable athletes, but they've all worked hard at their "trade."
  • squ1rrelsqu1rrel Registered User Posts: 271 Junior Member
    @sushiritto Is there a big difference between 1600 and the 1 mile?
  • sushirittosushiritto Registered User Posts: 3,322 Senior Member
    edited May 9
    @squ1rrel I don't mean to state the obvious, but 1 mile is 1,609.34 meters. So, your time of 5:04 for a mile would be a couple/few seconds less for 1,600 meters, which is the standard for most track meets as mentioned above.

    With proper track and strength coaching and hard work, you just never know. I don't mean to push you into anything that you don't want to do, but OTOH, soccer is a tough ladder to climb, especially with your size and weight.
  • squ1rrelsqu1rrel Registered User Posts: 271 Junior Member
    @sushiritto Lol I think my time was for the 1600, but everyone I know refers to the 1600 as the mile so I said that. It shouldn't make that big of a difference though...
  • sushirittosushiritto Registered User Posts: 3,322 Senior Member
    Maybe you didn't run with an all-out effort, maybe your shoes weren't the best running shoes, maybe you didn't run on a track, maybe your running form needs work, there are a lot of variables, which we don't know here. And you're just 14-15 years old. But you should decide on a path soon, so if you choose the path of soccer or track, you can start to get on the radar.
  • sushirittosushiritto Registered User Posts: 3,322 Senior Member
    NESCAC Championship Qualifying Standards:

    800m = 2:04
    1,500m = 4:20

    https://www.nescac.com/sports/track/2017-18/championship/qualifying_standard
Sign In or Register to comment.