right arrow
Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04

MBA Admissions Advice: Go For The Easy "A"

2»

Replies to: MBA Admissions Advice: Go For The Easy "A"

  • PurpleTitanPurpleTitan 12814 replies29 threads Senior Member
    @UCBUSCalum‌: Around 2000.
    · Reply · Share
  • frostedcupcakefrostedcupcake 12 replies1 threads New Member
    Agree with the article. Folks look at the headline.
    FTR, 'Easy A' is a good film.
    · Reply · Share
  • RMIBstudentRMIBstudent 612 replies84 threads Member
    Are these admissions officers just stupid/lazy or something? Those are the only reasons I can think of to actually prefer people who take easier classes. Unless if they view the admissions process as a test of your ability to market yourself and game the system, or something.
    · Reply · Share
  • perazzimanperazziman 2357 replies63 threads Senior Member
    edited August 2015
    I am under the impression that the GMAT and GRE are the great equalizers for business schools. They assign a lot more weight to standardized test scores and work experience than gpa. In this sense, they are not the same as law schools. B schools seem to go by the idea that if you were at a tuff school or took hard classes then your GMAT will be higher. I don't think anybody wows business schools with a high gpa. For example, I am looking a the 2014 US News and World report, business school rankings. I can see that at top schools such as MIT Chicago Columbia and Dartmouth admitted applicants had average gpas below 3.6. The average gpa at Cornell is 3.29. It is hard for me to imagine that these schools didn't have applicants with much higher gpa and had to "settle" for such low gpas.
    edited August 2015
    · Reply · Share
  • shawbridgeshawbridge 5800 replies53 threads Senior Member
    The best schools are looking for people with leadership potential (or at least so they say). They take some, particularly younger ones, because they were academically great and have potential. For the bulk of students who are older, they weight what they have done in their jobs more highly. So, someone with a 4.0 and high GMATs or GREs who has had undistinguished jobs for 6 years isn't going to get in, but someone with a 3.95 and 169/170 GREs and one year of impressive work might well get in.
    · Reply · Share
  • sportsman5sportsman5 12 replies0 threads New Member
    I believe that MBA programs are aware that majoring in electrical engineering or physics is more difficult than economics or history. In terms of analyzing a person's transcripts, it seems that schools look at basic quantitative classes like micro/ macro economics, calculus, accounting, finance, statistics etc and compare those. What a student gets in creative writing, European history, or biology won't carry as much weight. Therefore, a person with an overall GPA of 3.4 and quantitative GPA of 3.5 will likely have as good of a chance of admissions as someone with a 3.6 overall and 3.5 in quantitative classes. The quantitative GPA calculation would most likely exclude high level engineering and math classes and focus on the intro/ second level classes that are common for most applicants to take like calculus, stat, and micro economics. It can be safe to assume that being an alum of certain schools will give you a slight bump. However, it's most likely not as much of a bump as many graduates from those elite schools would like. The reason for this is that work experience, letters of recommendation, essays, and test scores account for the vast majority of the application. GPA likely accounts for only 10-15% of the equation at most schools. Test scores 15-20% and every other factor the remaining ~70%. This is the reverse of undergrad where grades and test scores account for ~70% of admissions and grades are weighted more than test scores.

    In conclusion, to get into a top 15 MBA program it is usually essential to do well in basic math courses. Beyond that it probably doesn't matter greatly what other courses you take or what grades you get. Keeping an overall GPA above 3.0 will greatly benefit most students, but a 3.4 vs 3.6 in classes outside of the basic quantitative classes likely will make very little difference at most schools unless you are on the very edge of getting in.
    · Reply · Share
This discussion has been closed.

Recent Activity