Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.

Hard to get high GPA? Grade inflation or deflation?

HumbleForceHumbleForce Registered User Posts: 7 New Member
edited May 2015 in Emory University
How difficult for a humanities major to get >3.8 GPA? Looking to go to law school. I've heard conflicting views. Obviously I'm willing to put the work in necessary, but I just want to see what the people on this forum think. Thanks.
«1

Replies to: Hard to get high GPA? Grade inflation or deflation?

  • aluminum_boataluminum_boat Registered User Posts: 1,539 Senior Member
    3.8 is never easy. Doing it in a humanities course is easier than doing it in math.
  • HumbleForceHumbleForce Registered User Posts: 7 New Member
    How often have you seen it done at Emory, if you go there?
  • AlacrityPainAlacrityPain Registered User Posts: 89 Junior Member
    edited May 2015
    As someone who just completed his freshman year, most of my friends do not have 3.8, though granted they are mostly premed people. Put in another perspective, 83 students(6%) had a 4.0 after first semester.

    To consistently achieve a high GPA, you should expect not to do much of the party/greek life stuff, not to say that it isn't possible but you have to spend a lot of time studying/doing classwork. Hopefully your writing skills are awesome !
  • aluminum_boataluminum_boat Registered User Posts: 1,539 Senior Member
    How often have you seen it done at Emory, if you go there?
    About 3/4 of my best friends graduated with a 3.8+... for what it's worth.


    Google Phi Eta Sigma - and see what people get first semester. And I guess you could extrapolate it out six more semesters. To give you a very rough idea.

  • bernie12bernie12 Registered User Posts: 5,201 Senior Member
    83 students is actually a lot in my opinion. Once you add 3.8-4.0, that is well over 10%. Obviously Emory, like most private schools, is inflated. If humanities, it is especially inflated. There is a reason many social science and humanities departments move their honors thesis qualifier cutoffs to a 3.7 to even be considered. I wouldn't trust freshmen points of view because they are mainly comparing it to the GPA's they see and got in high school, where many attended schools where those who took rigorous courses were rewarded with GPA's over 4.0 if they did well. College is kind of opposite, where you more than likely pay a penalty for taking rigorous courses/instructors because course level and rigor is not accounted for in computing GPA's (the only school I know that is starting an adjustment system is Chapel Hill). In college, if you just choose everything correctly, you can in theory not be/become good at much academically, and still get mostly A's. That's my cynical, true take on it. It is merely a game if you are pre-law/pre-health or plan to get jobs in fields that screen based upon GPA first (like finance and stuff). If you're very talented or don't mind working very hard, you can choose challenging instruction, but if you are just normal and want to learn a little, puff up your CV/resume, and move the heck on, you just select a mixture of courses (mostly easy- and many humanities courses know the goals of the students and the GPA's expected by them so I'm sure most classes give well over 50% A range grades. Those odds aren't bad) and instructors. If you find that you do well in a challenging instructor's course (even if you selected them by accident) then you can kind of do what you want. But either way, college puts you in control for the most part.
  • Goizueta17Goizueta17 Registered User Posts: 8 New Member
    As someone who goes to Oxford it is not that hard to get a perfect gpa, especially since all there is to do in Oxford is study for the most part. Most teachers play favorites so it is about getting close to your professor and getting to know them better. I got into an honor society at Oxford and I believe around 100 people got in out of the class, which is a lot so it is definitely doable.
  • bernie12bernie12 Registered User Posts: 5,201 Senior Member
    I hope it isn't one of those ridiculous honor societies like the ones on main that are simply a check on your resume (as in doesn't do squat, is another stupid credential honoring those with high GPA's).
  • Goizueta17Goizueta17 Registered User Posts: 8 New Member
    edited May 2015
    Basically. I was accepted into Phi Eta Sigma which you just need a 3.9 gpa, which what I was referring to. That reminds me for any student at Oxford interested in business do not join the business club it basically is a check on resume that does absolutely nothing.

    Also the person was just asking about how difficult it is to get a high gpa, so you can calm down bernie.
  • bernie12bernie12 Registered User Posts: 5,201 Senior Member
    Haha, I wasn't getting riled up....just pointing at how funny some of the honor societies are (admittedly, the pre-professional ones are usually "more interesting" in a not good way) And since you just told me which one it was....it is like one of the ones I allude to. It definitely is national (accredited and all), but has little high profile activities. I believe the same proportion on main get it...This just pretty much goes to prove that efforts to get a high GPA at Emory are greatly exaggerated. It is often especially easy as freshman, at least in terms of the level of courses (there are often transition issues preventing many from taking advantage of it). Usually freshman year can help provide nice padding as you get to take things like freshman writing requirement (always English) which typically gives high grades and a freshman seminar where most get A's. And depending on your intended major, you may be enrolled in other high grading courses. But even in other years, unless in an unusually hard class, what you put in is what you get out. Again, most instructors are not trying harm students (mainly their career prospects because a challenge in a vacuum isn't really bad, but with the backdrop of grad/prof. schools and jobs, can be) by challenging them too much. And even when they do, they make sure to give reasonable grades. Emory isn't out to screw anyone.
  • HumbleForceHumbleForce Registered User Posts: 7 New Member
    would you guys happen to know if classes are majority just A, B, C classes? especially for something like history or poli sci or english? or would A-'s, B+'s, etc. still be relevant in humanity classes
  • bernie12bernie12 Registered User Posts: 5,201 Senior Member
    +/- for everything....trust me, this is actually for your benefit because it provides more gradations and basically means that instructors in non-science classes (except maybe econ and core b-school courses) will rarely assign a C grade (they can use a B or B- instead. And those are not common humanities, history, or polisci. You may get one on an assignment's first draft, but it will hardly ever end up anyone's final grade).
  • aluminum_boataluminum_boat Registered User Posts: 1,539 Senior Member
    I've had a couple teachers who have given A, B, etc. I agree that +/- is much, much more common.
  • collegestu816collegestu816 Registered User Posts: 238 Junior Member
    edited May 2015
    Emory is definitely a bit grade inflated overall, including the Humanities. However, the difficulty of the classes is still a step above that of your average state school. To give you an idea, the average graduating GPA in the past few years has been right around 3.4. There is an honor society you can get in your junior/senior year called Phi Beta Kappa, which takes the top 10% of each class. The cutoff used to be around 3.83 about 10 years ago, but has inflated to right around a 3.90 in recent years.

    Also, GPA is not heavily weighted for law school admissions. Unlike med school admissions where GPA and MCAT are weighted equally, for law school it's based about 70-80% LSAT alone, with GPA, ECs, interview, and everything else making up the remaining amount. Also keep in mind that the market for lawyers has been extremely saturated these days so the top entry level jobs at the big law firms go almost exclusively to graduates of the top 20 law schools. Graduates from mid or lower tier law schools will be stuck with jobs in small law firms or public service (where entry level jobs pay a small fraction as the big, prestigious firms), or find jobs that they could have gotten without the law degree (aka being underemployed).
  • aluminum_boataluminum_boat Registered User Posts: 1,539 Senior Member
    I agree with ^ with one change. T-14 Law School. But my friends who went down that path are saying top 5 or bust. Or you will be underemployed.
  • bernie12bernie12 Registered User Posts: 5,201 Senior Member
    edited May 2015
    Thanks for pointing that out @collegestu816 : What is interesting is that main campus's admissions statistics have not really changed over that period of time.

    Also, I would advise some caution with the course comparisons. As a grad. student at GSU right now (you know this collegestu), what I notice is that the lower/mid-division science courses are a lot easier at GSU, but the advanced courses vs. say, Emory, are very similar in rigor (in fact, I found out from some of my students that the physiology type of courses were actually much harder....if I compared molec. cell to Yebvobnick's molec. cell course, Emory would lose. Versus Eisen, not so much. Also, their biochem class is the same level/a little higher than the biology version of the biochem course at Emory). The only difference is that the competition is completely different (perhaps because of lower admissions threshold AND the prevalence of non-traditional students) so a good student can pretty much ride the curve at GSU, but the same level class would not yield grades low enough to curve so you have to work harder at Emory to ensure an A. I would almost argue that many advanced courses at Emory are perhaps underwhelming content wise because many Emory instructors is much more "political" when designing course work. It appears GSU instructors for advanced courses have less of an incentive to straight up teach below the level of students perhaps because not as many pre-professional or simply because students don't pay as much. And honestly, from TAing over there, I observe much less complaining about course rigor and more complaining about the quality. At Emory it is kind of the opposite.

    Unless the instructor is phenomenal, they would not hear the end of it if the course was more challenging than expected. Note that I also have a cousin who gives me a social science perspective because he is a political science major and from helping him with some of his course work, it appears the demands are not that different and are in fact, sometimes more demanding. Interestingly enough, some of their lower division instructors are rough (like I'm sure his international studies teacher would be burned at the stake at Emory for the sorts of exams he wrote which usually involved reading an article/very long passage during the exam and then having to answer several essay questions on it. And the writing load wasn't a joke either). But again, the primary difference is that when the bar was raised that high over there, not as many reached it. My cousin could pretty much reach it by just completing the work. At Emory, students would begrudgingly reach it if taught decently, so it would be much harder to stand out, but the problem is, most instructors rather just not bother doing that in the social sciences (non-econ that is) and even the sciences for that matter. Students at Emory have a lot more power than they do at GSU/many state schools. I can think of maybe a handful of particularly challenging polisci/history instructors (Allitt, Lancaster, Giles, any of the "law/constitution" teachers...) off the top of my head. And these teachers teach small sections, whereas the difficult soc. sci instructors at GSU teach much larger ones.....
    Anyway, my conclusion would be: While rigor in certain areas may be higher, that isn't always the case. Instead the expectations for (and level of competition in), what is usually the medium level of work given, is generally higher than at most state schools. As in they expect you to do more vs. the work given to you than if they gave the same elsewhere. Usually their expectations are met, but it isn't like Emory students are being pushed to a particular limit in terms of content rigor or ability to handle a high workload that often. It's rare that an instructor will do that. And this is just comparing GSU. Let's not talk places like UGA. The content will be more similar than different in that case, and the competition will be less tough, but still somewhat tough depending on dept.


«1
This discussion has been closed.