Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.
Please take a moment to read our updated TOS, Privacy Policy, and Forum Rules.

Avian innovation toolbase - comments?

InquisitiveOneInquisitiveOne - Posts: 1,151 Senior Member
edited June 2010 in High School Life
avian innovation toolbase:


and guess what the most innovative bird in that list is? no, not the crow. the freaking house sparrow. that dumb bird that probably didn't even know that a window is not the sky, and keeps ramming itself against the window trying to get out, while making itself a youtube laughingstock.

anyways, i'm sure they did try to do some controls for the relative abundance of birds. the most common birds nailed the most innovations. most innovations were done by carrion crows, magpies, herring gulls, house sparrows, european starlings, peregrine falcons, blackbirds, and a few others.

even the mallard managed to nail down a considerable number of innovations. the MALLARD.

but seriously, most of the rarer birds hardly get any innovations at all. even the new calendonian crow didnt even get an entry.

listing the innovations and leaving them for evaluation is better than counting them equally. seriously. eating vomit (yes, that WAS one of the innovations listed in the actual paper) would otherwise count the same as using cars to crack nuts. (although the latter would fit under a technical innovation and not a food type one)

and they only listed a SINGLE innovation for that most creative of birds: the kea. what???
Post edited by InquisitiveOne on

Replies to: Avian innovation toolbase - comments?

This discussion has been closed.