Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.
Please take a moment to read our updated TOS, Privacy Policy, and Forum Rules.

War's Grim Reality Hits West Point

momoftwinsmomoftwins Registered User Posts: 2,668 Senior Member

War's grim reality hits West Point
By Greg Bruno

Times Herald-Record
January 07, 2007

West Point ? On the second floor of Cullum Hall, down dimly lit corridors and dark stairs, bronze plaques hang with names of graduates killed in battle.

There are hundreds here, from Civil War warriors to Donaldson Preston Tillar III, the lone alumnus shot down in Desert Storm 16 years ago.

But it's the unfinished memorial in Cullum ? for now, a bare white wall awaiting Iraq's final tally ? that is redefining war at the U.S. Military Academy.

As the war in Iraqi marches into a fourth year, and plans for sending more troops materialize in Washington, West Point graduates are facing a grim phenomenon: They are dying at a faster rate than in any war in recent history.

Since 2003, 40 graduates have been killed in Iraq. And statistics don't reveal a single explanation for the comparative spike in casualties. Reports show that graduates have died in accidents, been killed by snipers and roadside bombs, and even been murdered by their own men.

"It used to be, in linear conflicts like Vietnam, Korea, you had to be in armor, infantry, aviation or field artillery to be exposed," said Maj. Paul Hayes, a former West Point military instructor who served in the Middle East in 2003.

"Now, if you look at the guys who have been killed, they've been a mix of everything. What branch you are doesn't matter."

Of the 58,000 Americans killed in action during a decade and a half in Vietnam, 273 were military academy graduates ? less than half a percent. The four-year Korean War saw similar ratios for graduates.

But in Iraq, a war increasingly fought in the urban confines of a hostile insurgency, roughly 1.3 percent of the more than 3,000 Americans killed were commissioned as second lieutenants at West Point.

That's three times the percentage of Vietnam, six times World War II ? and more than 20 times World War I.

To be sure, death tolls from Iraq are statistically low compared to other wars. Dennis Showalter, a military historian at Colorado College and former West Point professor, said drawing comparisons between conflicts based on samples so small is "apples and oranges." Four graduates have been killed in Afghanistan.

But others say the numbers are a macabre badge of honor for the Long Gray Line.

"Our junior officers are leading by example; they are out front," said Lt. Col. Kevin Farrell, a military academy history professor who commanded an Army battalion in Baghdad last year. "That's why they are at increased risk.

"But that's what we need them to do."

They call it a platoon leader's war.

Unlike past conflicts, with soldiers in large formations directed by commanders off the battlefield, the small units in Iraq have more independence. Targeted by insurgents, platoons led by the Army's youngest officers navigate the constantly evolving battlefield.

In many cases, it's leaders only months removed from West Point who are calling the shots.

"I'm just a guy with boots on the ground trying to keep his platoon alive," says 1st Lt. Cecil Wolberton, a member of the "Class of 9/11" who graduated from West Point in 2005 and is now serving in Iraq.

"I command a tank and am probably the most vulnerable one in my vehicle, because my head is out of the hatch and I am looking for IEDs," or improvised explosive devices.

"The rest of my crew, one sergeant and two privates, are safe down in the turret. I need to be in this position to best protect my tank."

Like other recent graduates, Wolberton, 26, is leading soldiers in a war that looks different from the days of "Shock and Awe" and "Mission Accomplished." There is no passing out candy in Baghdad anymore, no shaking hands in Ramadi.

Today's leaders are ducking sniper fire and avoiding roadside bombs as they try to piece Iraq back together.

On the ground, it's a different strategy from another long, unpopular war. In Vietnam, infantry platoons would typically head out with one lieutenant among dozens of soldiers, and the officer was usually well-protected at the rear or in the middle of the convoy.

The guys in the front took most of the bullets.

Retired Army Col. Seth Hudgins, a Vietnam veteran who heads West Point's graduate association, said risks to officers four decades ago were easier to anticipate.

"In Vietnam, at least you knew what direction you were going in. For the most part, that's where the enemy was," Hudgins says. "But in Iraq, you don't know where the enemy is. It's hard to train for, and certainly difficult to execute."

There are other reasons for West Point's mounting death toll.

For one, the Army has shrunk dramatically from a draft-fueled force to the all-volunteer army it is today. As such, there are proportionately more West Point-trained officers in the combat zone now than there were 30 years ago, experts speculate.

James Hosek, a military analyst at the RAND Corp., said choice is also playing a factor in the rising proportion of graduates' deaths.

"West Point graduates are disproportionately more likely to go into combat occupations," Hosek said. "They, in essence, are selected or choose to select positions that are risky and challenging.

"It could be that West Point officers are willing to enter occupations because they believe this is how they can most effectively serve."

USMA officials say that's true: Graduates do have some say in the fields they enter. Dangerous callings, like infantry, fill up first.

Capt. Timothy Moshier got out front early.

By the eighth grade, the 6-foot-2-inch soccer player from Bethlehem had set his sights on the Army. Good grades and a civic spirit were his ticket to the college of his choice. He chose West Point.

"It was the only place," says his father, Jim Moshier, who still lives in the Albany suburb where his son grew up. "I think Tim always had, at a very early age, a sense of wanting to serve others. There was just something in him that made him want to serve and protect."

But on April 1, Moshier's mission came to a premature end when his attack helicopter fell from the sky near Baghdad. Friends and family say he was at the controls of the Apache Longbow when it was taken down by "possible" enemy fire.

Moshier, 25, a new father and a young husband, died a war hero, less than four years after graduation day. He's buried in Bethlehem Cemetery.

"I wonder still, today, if the cadets get it," Katie Moshier, the captain's widow, said recently. "They are young, 18 and 19 years old, in the thick of it. Do they really understand what they are about to do?"

Most say they do get it: Reminders are constant. One by one, names of the war dead are sounded out during mealtimes in the massive cadet mess, high above the Hudson River.

Forty names, 40 reminders of the true cost of a West Point education.

Capt. James F. Adamouski, a 1995 graduate, was the first West Point casualty in Iraq. He died when the Black Hawk helicopter he was riding in crashed on April 2, 2003. Second Lt. Emily Perez, the first female member of the 9/11 class to die in combat, was No. 32, felled by an IED.

Moshier was No. 28.

War Has Gotten Safer for American ground forces.

New weaponry and overwhelming firepower have changed how the United States engages the enemy. Military medicine also has improved, and the use of body armor is now commonplace.

In World War I, 50,000 American soldiers died during five years of fighting; it would take six decades in Iraq at the current rate to match that toll.

And yet, the current war continues to produce a steady trickle of U.S. deaths ? most often by an elusive, indiscriminate weapon.

Pentagon data show that a third of all deaths in Iraq are linked to improvised explosive devises. Junior officers, who lead many of the patrols, are especially vulnerable, experts and soldiers say. According to the Pentagon, more than half of West Point's casualties were caused by IEDs.

But roadside bombs aren't the only threat. Academy graduates also are dying in helicopter crashes, small arms fire and targeted sniper attacks. One, Capt. Phillip Esposito, 28, of Suffern, was allegedly murdered by his own soldier.

Joe Sharrock, a West Point graduate who served as a company commander in Iraq at the start of the war, said he understands why classmates risk everything to fight.

The 1997 graduate has since left the Army and publicly opposes the war. But he supports his fellow academy graduates.

"I've heard of guys going back for a third time, and they are still going out on every single tour," Sharrock said during a recent telephone interview from Colorado, where he lives. "When they come home they don't go to their families first. They go to the homes of their dead soldiers.

"That's what is bred into us at that institution."

West Point-educated officers aren't the only ones bearing an inordinate share of the death toll.

A recent analysis of American troop deaths by Samuel Preston, a University of Pennsylvania demographer, found that the risk for Marine lance corporals is more than three times that of all troops in Iraq.

Not that anyone's counting.

"I talked to a spokesman, maybe the spokesman, for the Marines," Preston recalled in a recent interview. "I said, 'Are you aware of the high death rates for Marines in Iraq?' He said, 'Yes, but we don't want to publicize it. We don't want to embarrass the other services.'

"For the Marines," Preston said, "it was a badge of honor to have a high death rate."

As for Army officers, the Penn researcher found that first and second lieutenants were 19 percent more likely to be killed in action than all other Army ranks. Evidence suggests West Point graduates are bearing much of that burden.

According to the study, 64 junior Army officers were killed between March 2003 and April 2006. Nearly half ? 28 ? earned their stripes at West Point.

"When I was a cadet, I can only think of one time that it was announced over the loudspeaker in the mess hall that someone on active duty died," said Hayes, the former academy instructor and combat veteran.

Times have changed.

"They knew Emily Perez. They knew these people who graduated (and died in Iraq). That has an effect on cadets," Hayes said.

It's changing mindsets, too. At different times during their four years, students go from kid to cadet, cadet to soldier. Now, the steady drumbeat of Iraq is pushing the shift earlier.

"You're reminded every day that you decide when the real Army starts," Hayes said.

Or when it ends.
Post edited by momoftwins on

Replies to: War's Grim Reality Hits West Point

  • shogunshogun Registered User Posts: 1,895 Senior Member
    Thanks for posting that MOT. It's important for all to keep in mind what West Point is for, as it is paying the lion's share of service academy blood in the current struggle in the Middle East. It's also important to note that the traditional "combat occupations" no longer hold true--men and women, in a variety of branches are paying the ultimate price.
  • aspenaspen Registered User Posts: 748 Member
    Good article, thanks for posting MOT.

    While my cadet son's perception of death (and life) differs from mine, he is fully aware of the risks of being a leader of warriors. He said the West Point military instructors make it very clear that "you don't get do-overs in war".

    The growing list of brave warriors paying the ultimate price is a constant reminder that it's a dangerous occupation to be "the only thing that stands between the monsters and the weak"
  • majmattmasonmajmattmason Registered User Posts: 359 Member
    West Point. Where the dead outnumber the living.
  • KateMacKateMac Registered User Posts: 79 Junior Member
    "West Point. Where the dead outnumber the living."

    Now that's a cheery thought for a mom whose daughter is reporting July 2...
  • majmattmasonmajmattmason Registered User Posts: 359 Member

    My apologies, I didn't mean to cause grief. It is one of the many items one learns from having a child as a cadet. The West Point cemetary is a very moving place that should be visited while at the Academy.

    "The dead (7,000) outnumber the cadets (4,000) at West Point. Pennies and pebbles rest on the grave markers: tokens of remembrance, many left by strangers, for the families of the departed are often far away. As if sent by central casting, deer lope past the white headstones at dusk. Some of the inhumed died in war (George Armstrong Custer, tourist favorite), others in peace (Army coach Red Blaik, whose football-shaped stone bears the legend, "On Brave Old Army Team"), one on the launching pad (Ed White, who was incinerated aboard Apollo 1). But just as all lie under West Point, in the end their loyalties lie with West Point."

    Again, my apologies for causing distress. Let us remember the reason why they attend and support all of them.
  • p-piperp-piper Registered User Posts: 44 Junior Member

    All parents of current Cadets at West Point live with the knowledge that their child is being trained to be put in harm's way. Each need to learn to deal with and accept that knowledge. It is a fact of life, for Cadets and their parents. While one should not obssess on the subject, it should not be shut out of your mind, either. Being a West Point parent is not for the faint of heart or spirit.
  • momoftwinsmomoftwins Registered User Posts: 2,668 Senior Member
    And I did not mean to cause distress for anyone, but to present something that is very real. It's easy to get caught up in the honor and prestige of attending West Point. We need to remember that there is a sobering facet to this experience, also.
  • WPSON2010WPSON2010 Registered User Posts: 416 Member
    The cadets have chosen a difficult and dangerous path in life with the belief the rewards outweigh the risks. It's best not to bury our heads under the sand. Momoftwins reported the facts and they're important to know for both the parents and the cadets.
  • KateMacKateMac Registered User Posts: 79 Junior Member
    I halfway posted my first response somewhat "tongue in cheek," somewhat not. Trust me, we have had those discussions with our daughter. We are aware, hopefully as is she, that this is more than just a "college experience" full of prestige and honor. It is a duty and a commitment.

    We have been very fortunate to have visited with some parents (and MOT is one, got in touch with her in the fall via an acquaintance in the state parents club) as well as some graduates. One of the best statements my daughter heard was from the daughter of one of my husband's co-workers when she said one must want to serve, rather than be served, to enter this life. My daughter happens to be this sort of person, and I am proud of her for so many reasons, but her sense of service to others has always been at the top of the list.

    Anyway, I realized the post was not meant to cause undue distress, and I truly didn't take it that way!
This discussion has been closed.