Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.

Replies to: Gifted Issues

  • doschicosdoschicos Registered User Posts: 20,370 Senior Member
    It would be helpful to give a synopsis of the article or pull a quote or two along with a statement about why you find it interesting/worthy of discussion. :)
  • PentaprismPentaprism Registered User Posts: 503 Member
    Frankly, I couldn't find any thing new or interesting in the article. Studies like this one have been done years ago by (at least) Johns Hopkins CTY and Stanford EPGY.
  • WorryHurry411WorryHurry411 Registered User Posts: 1,112 Senior Member
    edited April 2016
    I meant to but got distracted by a phone call.

    "Despite their remarkable success, researchers concluded that the profoundly gifted students had experienced roadblocks along the way that at times prevented them from achieving their full potential."

    This article was posted on FB by a friend who is facing difficulties in finding good programs for his gifted child. His kid's IQ is 160 so far ahead of peers in his school's "G&T" program that's basically a hideout for special snowflakes of white PTA moms. Do you agree or disagree that "extremely" gifted ones suffer from lack of opportunities?
  • MarianMarian Registered User Posts: 13,217 Senior Member
    We all experience roadblocks that at times prevent us from reaching our full potential.

    I would have liked the article a lot better if it focused on what[s best for the children rather than the author's idea of how they could best be exploited to meet society's needs.
  • WorryHurry411WorryHurry411 Registered User Posts: 1,112 Senior Member
    His kid has 160 IQ but scored 142 on COGAT. Is there any co-relation between those two tests? What's the ceiling for COGAT?
  • TatinGTatinG Registered User Posts: 6,399 Senior Member
    Some schools in our district have a huge percentage of the kids labeled as Gifted. They get more money from the district that way.
  • mamaedefamiliamamaedefamilia Registered User Posts: 3,388 Senior Member
    edited April 2016
    In our district there were two tiers of gifted ed - IQ 130-145 (pull out) or IQ 145+ (full time). There wasn't a separate category for profoundly gifted (160+) And in my estimation, very few kids that I know who qualified for the upper level were PG. One exception was admitted to MIT at age 16. The majority were smart, high-achieving "quirky" kids with VERY pushy parents. The whirring helicopter blades were quite audible. However, as Lindagaf decribes, the G/T classification generally translated into a placement with more-motivated, higher-effort, and generally smarter peers and helped to keep boredom at bay. Gifted content in the curriculum will vary across teachers and districts.

    @WorryHurry411 Don't know what grade your friend's kid is in, but if he's not yet hit the 7th grade, check into the Caroline D. Bradley scholarship program - it's highly competitive but recipients get private HS tuition covered anywhere they can gain admittance, and that includes boarding schools. Kids apply as 7th graders. If your friend can afford boarding school, that might be one avenue. Another would be to enrich curriculum with on-line courses offered by CTY, Duke TIP, Stanford, etc. Dual enrollment at a local college might work - but that might merely mean that the students are older, not necessarily smarter.

    ETA: there was a thread in the boarding school section of the forum authored by a NY city based parent who was seeking boarding schools for his/her PG daughter. Might be worth a look over there.

  • Mom2aphysicsgeekMom2aphysicsgeek Registered User Posts: 4,499 Senior Member
    One of the differences I have noticed in the homeschooling community in recent yrs is the number of people homeschooling because their children are gifted and the school system would not allow their kids to progress at their natural rate of ability. Policies like no alg before grade X, even if the student is perfectly capable. Other large increases are in the 2E and LD groups.
  • mathmommathmom Registered User Posts: 32,042 Senior Member
    I was eventually was referred to a "Talented and Gifted" group in Junior High, but I failed the interview.My mother, who worked in my high school guidance department found out why: there was a note in my records from the school psychologist (who had presided over the interview for the club) noting that no child of my age could have read the books that I had described reading, therefore I was obviously a pathological liar.
    From one of the comments to the article. I find this so depressing and have heard these stories before. Luckily that didn't ever happen to my kids. I have one who is probably one of those top 1 percenters. I don't know his IQ score as in elementary school everyone always recognized that he was precocious. In first grade they tested his math skills and had him at 5th grade for concepts and third grade for actually knowing how to do the math, and allowed him a double skip in math. The second was more vanilla gifted - in the top 3% - but with some deficits in how he processed material.

    The gifted program (just for math and English, just 4th and 5th grade) was a pretty good fit for kid number two. The older one was still bored. The older one got into computer programming, is in his dream job and is not particularly ambitious to go further. He is unlikely to change the world. (Though he's making your searches at Google faster and more accurate.) The younger one, with more social graces, I think might end up accomplishing more.
  • mackinawmackinaw Registered User Posts: 3,014 Senior Member
    Our school district basically resisted having G&T programs in primary and middle schools. Working assumption: gifted kids would succeed one way or the other, it was the kids with academic problems or disabilities who needed special attention.

    High school was a different matter, largely because there were always AP courses, and students who were especially gifted in math and had exhausted their options in the HS could enroll in a course or two at the nearby university.

    So how did we handle this? Our oldest had hobbies, ones that deeply involved him. Fantasy baseball, statistics. But he was good enough in math that in 7th grade he finished 2nd in statewide math competition -- and never prepped for it or had any special courses.

    Even in HS he was not very stimulated by his courses, but he found satisfaction in his hobbies, in particular (again) fantasy sports, but also in some EC's: debate and journalism. When he ran out of math courses at the high school he did not want to take additional coursework at the university. So we didn't push this.

    When he got to college, there was no college debate team but he did write for the school newspaper, and he graduated with honors in a mathy subject (economics). In life after college, after deciding he didn't want to pursue an advanced degree, and after working for a few years for a consulting firm, he has had great career success as a very mathy journalist. I think in retrospect our school district's working philosophy wasn't wrong. Gifted kids will succeed.
  • mathyonemathyone Registered User Posts: 4,225 Senior Member
    "In our district there were two tiers of gifted ed - IQ 130-145 (pull out) or IQ 145+ (full time). There wasn't a separate category for profoundly gifted (160+) " Wow, that is amazing. I haven't heard of anything like tiered programs or full time programs.

    Our schools don't really have a gifted program other than a few hours of pull out in the elementary schools, which was politically unsustainable, so it became push-in so that all kids are now included in the gifted program. My kids were in classes with kids who flunked the grade or the kids who arrived in class with their own special teacher who according to my kid, spent most of her energy trying to keep them from disrupting the class. Usually unsuccessfully.
  • shawbridgeshawbridge Registered User Posts: 5,686 Senior Member
    The obstacles for GT students include mind-numbingly slow classes, probably weaker social skills on average, maybe weaker social interest (unclear about this), but also not being surrounded by peers playing in the same intellectual league. My father was a brilliant theoretical physicist who started reading the NY Times when he was three. His peer physics group included a number of brilliant guys (quite a few Nobels). Almost all of them would probably be classified as Asperger's in today's environment. He went to one of the NYC high schools that you test into so had a lot of bright kids in class with him. In my experience, finding an environment in which one has peers makes a big difference. I didn't find a peer group until college and my son until grad school. If GT programs don't do this per @WorryHurry411's and @Lindagaf's comments, they probably won't be particularly valuable.
  • RoonilWazlib99RoonilWazlib99 Registered User Posts: 467 Member
    @WorryHurry411 - the CoGAT is not an IQ test so you shouldn't try to compare. I believe the cap for CoGAT is 150, but I could be wrong.

    It measures reasoning skills like inference, classification, and deduction skills.

    Our district tests using the CoGAT in kindergarten and then again in 2nd grade. After successfully scoring in the top 2% on the CoGAT, kids are given the SOI. If they score high enough on that as well, they are invited to a pull out program in k-2.

    Kids have to test again in 2nd grade. If their scores aren't at a qualifying level, they are not invited back. So if you had a 98% in K and then a 96% in 2nd, you don't qualify for 3-5 gifted instruction. The gifted instructor said that is the worst conversation to have with parents. Also, if too many kids qualify, they end up just taking the tippy top qualifiers. It means having to tell parents their kid who was identified as gifted in kindergarten is no longer identified as such in 2nd. Not fair and not a conversation I'd like to be a part of on either end.

    The kids who score in the top 99th %ile are invited to participate in a full time gifted program within the district from 3-5th grade. They usually end up starting middle school in Algebra or higher.

    The kids who score at 98% are invited to do the pull out program from 3-5.

    Everyone has the option when choosing classes for 6th grade to accelerate or not (even if they were not in any gifted program). Our choices are Common Core 6th grade, CC 7/8, or CC 8 as 6th graders. They can also choose accelerated science and Language Arts.

    They also have the option for kids to push ahead after 6th if they want.

    I'd say we have about 70% of the kids follow grade level math standards in middle school, and start Geometry in 9th grade (that is our basic track here). About 25% finish Geometry up in 8th grade and do Algebra 2 as freshmen, and about 5% (15-20 kids a year?) finish Algebra 2 as 8th graders and start high school in Pre-Calculus.
This discussion has been closed.