Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.
Please take a moment to read our updated TOS, Privacy Policy, and Forum Rules.

Princeton Review - PSAT.

ApotheosisApotheosis Registered User Posts: 591 Member
How accurate are the PR practice tests? Are they harder than the actual PSAT or easier?

I took the first practice test and got a 209. I need to get higher than 212. :s
Post edited by Apotheosis on

Replies to: Princeton Review - PSAT.

  • Anon_Person_1Anon_Person_1 Registered User Posts: 2,453 Senior Member
    also interested..am taking practice one within the week (obvi)
  • JtotheEWJtotheEW Registered User Posts: 42 Junior Member
    I took the practice tests for the real SAT and got 1500-1600s and got 1830 on the real thing. So I assmue they are about the same since the PSAT is very similar to the SAT. Meaning that, for me, the PR tests were more difficult.
  • CANMomCANMom Registered User Posts: 43 Junior Member
    My son took the Princeton Review PSAT prep last year. He was consistently making in the 220s on the practice tests and got 215 on the 2006 PSAT. He did forget a bubble on the math, though; so I would say they're pretty accurate predictors. Also, he increased from 191 Soph yr.
  • ApotheosisApotheosis Registered User Posts: 591 Member
    Ok, #19 on the writing section in the second practice test makes absolutely no sense. Can anyone explain why B is correct?
  • redknightredknight Registered User Posts: 461 Member
    Apothesis, one of the things the PSAT does is to put things that sound correct in everyday usage as errors in the test to see if you know real grammar. "Would" usually does not belong in sentences with "if", it should be "were." That sounds weird to our ears since we usually hear "if" and "would" together, but it is technically improper grammar.
  • ApotheosisApotheosis Registered User Posts: 591 Member
    But it left out the "if" in the answer choices with "were". Does the sentence need an "if" if there's a "were"? lol
This discussion has been closed.