Attorney-gate could get interesting

conyat
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:00:14 +0000

If it wasn’t a joke about Bill, her reaction made no sense! Why would she wait for laughter and applause if she wasn’t mocking her husband?



You forgot Newt, Huckabee, Rush and Falwell.



It seems as though they decided to fire a handful of overly partisan US attorney’s who refused to prosecute democrats. If so, they ought to have been fired.



Where on earth did you get that idea? Talk radio?

Not even the Republicans in the DOJ are saying that the US Attorney’s were fired for refusing to prosecute Democrats. If it were true, don’t you think someone would have brought it up by now?

One of the claims was that Iglesias refused to prosecute voter fraud. But that’s because there was no case, as confirmed by the FBI (the government agency that does the investigations of voter fraud). In fact, the FBI says that were ZERO cases of indictable voter fraud that did not result in indictments by the fired US Attorneys. The fired US Attorneys indicted 100% of the time that the FBI thought an indictment was appropriate.

The case against a Democrat that Senator Domenci improperly called him about–the issue wasn’t that Iglesias was or wasn’t going to indict–the issue was that the Republicans wanted the indictment sped up in time for the election.