"Bollinger: Rich bully is getting his way" (NY Post)

collegeftw
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:03:37 +0000

columbia2002, you little ___

1) while it is ny that authorized it, theres a freaking reason it was tried in Supreme Court, not local or state courts. Its a constitutional issue that breeches past a local dispute

2) i use to think eminent domain was cruel too, but how the hell else would you expect the country to develop in terms of infrasctructure? there are some instances when I think eminent was fair and others when I thought it was a bit unfair, but oh well, I have come to understand the world is not always fair grow up you hoe

3) the constitution doesn’t specify eminent domain because the founding fathers meant for it to be flexible. it is implied under article 1, section 7 - quote from a professor, so guess what you hobo? I take the words of a professor over you ignorant as. what are you anyway, jobless reject that columbia didn’t want, so you go on CC and complain? lmao dude, so freaking low