Case Western vs. U Rochester Engineering

VMT
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:45:38 +0000

Good point CRD. On the other hand, just because a program is more “hands-on” doesn’t preclude it from providing theoretical underpinnings. There are degrees of hands on. And, if the 2 sides work in concert, it could be a great way to really establish the theoretical side. I understand there is only so much that can be covered in a 4-year program, so there is always a cost-benefit. I just wouldn’t assume a hands-on program is necessarily lacking the theoretical side.

I have personal experience with quite a few engineers from WPI, and I have found them to be very strong theoretically and practically. (I know this is a Case thread, but WPI seems to be the common hands-on example.) I would say without the hands-on, some students can be limited in their careers because they never establish the comfort level working the more practical side of problems. So, it depends on the specifics of the program and the student’s learning style and strengths.