Columbia or Stanford?

swingtime
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 02:38:05 +0000

I said a relative, I do not believe I specified the relation. The issue Mr. Brown is that you post negatively about Columbia in as many threads as your negativity can be inserted, not simply in threads that compare and contrast Columbia and Stanford. It is the obsession with spreading negativity about Columbia, whenever you see an opportunity to do so, that raises the question of balance in your life. With your credential from Stanford your expertise might be invaluable on the Stanford thread! Why not spread the POSITIVE message of Stanford at the Standford threads and just let Columbia go, since by your own admission it is beneath your contempt? Since Columbia is clearly beneath you, why continue to elevate it by your constant attentions? Your information about Columbia is patently false, anyway, and the need to spread misinformation in as many threads as you can seems an “unreasonable” use of the time of such a highly credentialed individual as yourself. To this observer, your obsession with Columbia seems not particularly healthy since it has no rational basis in a connection of any sort whatsoever. And it seems perverse to spend as much time as you do heaping negativity on persons clearly decades younger than you are. Perhaps with adults your own chronological age this could be a healthy exercise. It is the audience you have selected for your rants that makes your obsession problematic.

If you are so inclined, publish the definitive book revealing the TRUTH about Columbia. Let it be vetted in the public domain. Use the tool of an editorially legitimate book to generate for yourself a more appropriate audience and a critical dialogue. As it stands, for the most part your behavior in this forum seems rather contemptible, given the target audience and specific purpose.