Criminal Background Question on app

younghoss
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:38 +0000

for the purpose of post 51, I don’t care if student had no alcohol, or looked like Otis the drunk from Mayberry. Am I such a poor writer? The point of post 51 only referred to the phrasing the OP has used. I made no reference to the validity of the charge in post 51. There is no reason to explain that cops lacked evidence about a DUI.

Post 51 only referenced the choice of wording the Op has used here a couple of times. I offer that the phrase the “charge was not proven” makes the student sound guilty. For the purposes of post 51, I don’t care why it wasn’t proven. Why it was unproven makes no difference whatsoever(for post 51).
I ask 48 to please re-read my post 51.