DOE & Title IX requirements for school-provided NIL

bluebayou
Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:43:06 +0000

same issue; the case was about anti-trust of NIL payments, aka, sharing in the revenue, not gender equity, per the federal judge. Other than Livvy Dunne, not sure how many other women have a strong claim. (And the cynic in me is that the ‘settlement’ was primarily so the attorneys can get paid.)

Mwfan1921:

The future revenue sharing is not part of this appeal, at least based on my current understanding.

Judge did not preclude future T9 claims.

btw:, here’s an attorney’s opinion who has repped plenty of T9 cases, some of which the federal judge already rejected.

Sportico.com – 30 Jan 25

The House Settlement Violates Title IX and Athletes’ Rights

The proposed House v. NCAA antitrust settlement violates Title IX and hurts the very NCAA athletes it is supposed to protect, says Arthur H. Bryant.