Essay in response to SAT prompt

whatiscollegeok
Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:04:13 +0000

Agreed, it only takes 2-3 lines to refute an argument. Don’t go overboard. You don’t need a paragraph. However, my point was that it is better not to mention an opposing point if it cannot be refuted completely. The concluding paragraph serves best as a final summary of points and extension of the main idea to that of a broader scope.

Here is an example of three generalizations in sucession that are explained in a few lines:

One of the most fascinating aspects of the human mind is its ability to understand problems and create solutions to them. No two individuals will view a situation in the same light. A combination of these varied perspectives has created a conventional way to look at different kinds of problems.

Consider how weak these statements are standing alone. However, with a relevant supporting example:

For instance, the scientific method is a product of the genius of many scientists. However, several scientists still argue as to which “version” of the scientific method is correct. Is one to make observations first, or pose a question to define a problem beforehand? These two variations of the same method, among others that exist, ultimately achieve the same result. Therefore, the only difference in utilizing an alternate method is the method itself.

The above was pulled from an essay addressing the topic: Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things their own way?

(those who took the SAT in january 2006 might remember this topic)

Just provide an example and link ideas together to counter an argument. It doesn’t take paragraphs.