Febrary ACT 2012 Reading Discussion

jimi123
Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:29:45 +0000

I thought that too, but in the next paragraph the author clearly states at the beginning that states had very different constitutions because the states themselves were different, providing PA and mrylnd as examples. But I think that the choice about avoiding and introducing SUCCESSFUL constitutions may be wrong because the author never describes the states’ constitutions as successful, but just different. Anyone else care to weigh in?