Intelligent Design

FountainSiren
Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:29:45 +0000

Mini: “I (an intelligent being, I hope ) can design a random or chaotic number sequence that could indicate nothing about the designer or demonstrate anything in the way of design. Using this analogy I could argue [. . .]”

Is this the exception that proves the rule when it comes to arguing from analogy?

Mini: “The problem with arguing from analogy [. . .], is that it is notoriously unreliable.”