Is it just me or

Computerized
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:03:06 +0000

HarvardBound1123:

what lolcats said was right, its either arrive at, in or by. But for the context of this question, it would be “arrived at” since it is referring to a place (NY) therefore you arrive “at” a place not necessarily “in” a place or “by” a place. It would work to say arrived by car etc, or arrived in a train, but not arrived in or arrived by a place.



You seem so sure of yourself, yet you’re wrong. The correct term would be “arrived in New York”. You arrive IN cities, but you arrive AT a place.

I arrived IN New York.
I arrived AT New York airport.