SAT Subject Test U.S. History Prep Book

IceQube
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:52:18 +0000

AstroHungarian:

… I never said they were irrelevant.



Correct. I said they were irrelevant.

quote=AustroHungarian




I saw a question about Gaddafi in the Barron’s book. Funny how even my textbook (The American Pageant) doesn’t mention Gaddafi.

I think that’s a hint that the tests are irrelevant.

Not to mention the fact that I wasted 2 hours of my life taking 2 Barron’s test and feeling that neither of the Barron’s tests helped me at all after taking the actual SAT II test.



AustroHungarian:

I thought the questions seemed similar to the “Hard” rated questions on the official practice SAT II.



Lol.

Did you even take an official practice SAT II?

Nowhere in any official practice SAT II USH exam are questions labeled “hard.” This includes the answer key.

Lol.



AustroHungarian:

Are you sore about not getting a perfect on the practice exams?



Lol.

Nice ad hominem.



AustroHungarian:

Also 800 in USH…



Lol.

There are multiple ways to skin a cat.

So you’re proud of taking the way that involved a toothpick, eh?