Stupid judges strike again

Hunt
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:27:59 +0000

Well, JHS gave us more of the statute than the article did, and it includes a list of “places” where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. While it’s not exclusive, it’s a fair inference that the statute isn’t meant to apply to acts that occur in public places. It’s hard to believe that there isn’t another crime that this action could fit under.