The New Measurements Elite Colleges Don't Want You to See

College Search & Lists
1

<p><a href=“http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.carey.html[/url]”>http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.carey.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Is Our Students Learning?
The measurements elite colleges don’t want you to see. </p>

<h2>By Kevin Carey </h2>

<p>Imagine you’re about to put a chunk of your life savings into a mutual fund. Now imagine you peruse the various “best mutual fund” guides on the news rack, only to find they’re all missing crucial pieces of information. The guides list where the fund managers went to college, how much investment capital they’ve attracted, and what kind of “experience” investors had at the annual fund meeting. But they don’t tell you what you most want to know: What the funds’ rates of return have been–or if they’ve ever made a dime for anyone. You might still decide to invest in a mutual fund, but it would be a heck of a crapshoot. And with their scorecard hidden, fund managers wouldn’t be under much pressure to perform, let alone improve.
That imaginary mutual-fund market pretty much shows how America’s higher-education market works. Each year prospective college students and their parents pore over glossy brochures and phone-book-sized college guides in order to decide how to invest their hard-earned tuition money–not to mention four years of their lives. Some guides, like the popular rankings published by U.S. News & World Report, base ratings on factors like alumni giving, faculty salaries, and freshman SAT scores. Others identify the top “party schools,” most beautiful campuses, and most palatial dorms. </p>

<p>But what’s missing from all the rankings is the equivalent of a bottom line. There are no widely available measures of how much learning occurs inside the classroom, or of how much students benefit from their education. This makes the process of selecting a college a bit like throwing darts at a stock table. It also means that colleges and universities, like our imaginary mutual-fund managers, feel little pressure to ensure that students learn. As anyone who’s ever snoozed through a giant freshman psychology 101 lecture knows, sitting in a classroom doesn’t equal learning; knowledge doesn’t come by osmosis.</p>

<p>To be sure, determining the quality of a college education isn’t as simple as calculating the yield of a mutual fund. But it’s not impossible either. In fact, some reliable measures of student learning, engagement, and post-graduation success have already been developed. These measures reveal where professors are the most effective at teaching, where graduates readily find jobs, and where students walk away with little more than expertise in conspicuous beer consumption. So why haven’t you heard about these measures? Because many school administrators don’t want you to know. Putting their grades on the table is the last thing many colleges and universities want–especially since those grades would likely show that many of the elite colleges so prized by striving students are not backing up their lofty reputations by doing the best job of helping students learn. </p>

<p>…</p>

<p>Sorry to cut this off short (character limit) but the link to the rest of the article is here:
<a href=“http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.carey.html[/url]”>http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.carey.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>It’s a bit long but even just by skimming through you’ll notice some interesting findings that support the idea that the elite institutions may be overrated, at least in the quality of their education and how much and how well their students learn. Why else would they hide such information?</p>

2

<p>Do you mean criteria like IBanking/MC placement and placement into PhD/professional schools? </p>

<p>A ranking of such criteria, even if made, would not look too different from “current rankings” with SAT scores, acceptance rates etc.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Nope. Many schools post job/graduate placement data on their site. It’s just that there is no real way to compare them.</p>

3

<p>Colleges are selling what people are buying, so the focus should be shifted to the consumers - the students and their parents. Often nowadays academic rigor of the college is at the bottom of the students’ priorities. Many want to pick a college to fit squarely into their dream “college experience.”</p>

4

<p>Very good article! Too bad half of CC won’t read it, and instead will go to the “What Are My Chances?” forum.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, I think the set up of high school causes more students to care less about learning, and more about “getting things done”. The Ivies fall into that mentality of “getting things done”. Unfortunately, so do politics, elections, the war in Iraq, and George W. Bush.</p>

<p>As Kurt Vonnegut might say, “So it goes.”</p>