USC or CAL (Spring '10 Econ Transfer)

ns89
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:23:50 +0000

liek - i agree! most top MBA programs want you to have good work experience, and though berkeley isnt bad for that, USC is superb, spec within socal!
i think i could actually agree with going to USC first, and then something else… as long as its not too expensive in comparison to berkeley… :)

supa_ramga - yea it has, but you should also know that since current president sample came into office, USC has been consistently growing and getting better, as well as getting higher ranked… ive read in many places(including a UCLA paper) that USC most likely/definitely will overtake UCLA within the coming years… theyre just 2 rankings behind atm… and they just bought the norris cancer center as well as the LA county hospital, which means theyre medical field as well as ugrad bio/premed/neuro/etc etc will receive a lot of benefits…

USC is working towards becoming one of the top medical schools in the nation! not to mention they are consistently becoming more famous around the US, for example through winning football all the time, through their marching band performing as backup music for radiohead at the vmas or whatever it was…

ive said earlier to, that a lot more ppl from the east coast are applying nowadays, showing how much USC has grown at a national level… i definitely think it will take time before they pass UCLA, but maybe not too long…

as for asians, it might be because UCLA has a lot of asian students, so many of them are intls from asia, and many of them have relatives etc… ? just a theory… but yea its the same in sweden so i dont know …

only thing i know is that, USC is DEFINITELY on the rise!