Which science majors have the fewest conservatives?

pkmntrainerharry
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:16:13 +0000

how can you support the idea that morality is dependent on each person with evidence and observation?
morality is a concept humans created. i think that is supported by evidence. it evolved with human civilization. if, as evidence suggests, morality is a human-created concept, then it is dependent on each person. now the claim that there is an independent morality is what needs to be supported with evidence. where is it?

how do you support ‘in absence of empirical evidence, we should assume the thing doesn’t exist’ with evidence & observation?
idk. because science works?

can you answer my questions now?


if, as you argue, everyone is making assumptions (i.e. believe in some things that cannot be verified), then do you think there is no such thing as fact?
if verificationism/falsificationism/the scientific method are based on assumptions, is it no fact that the universe is 13.7 billion years old? is it no fact that electricity exists?


3a. if there is such a thing as fact, what determines that fact, if not verificationism/falsificationism/the scientific method?

or

3b. if there is no fact, and the scientific method is just as valid as theists’ assumption, why does it work so well? why have everything that has ever been explained, been explained by science?


now the claim that there is an independent morality is what needs to be supported with evidence. where is it?