Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.

A very interesting period of The College with a very interesting dean

85bears4685bears46 Registered User Posts: 404 Member
I don't want to constantly link Chicago Maroon articles but this one catches my attention. It describes a time at U of C College when Hanna Grey was trying to hold the university together.

https://www.chicagomaroon.com/article/2018/3/23/jonathan-z-smith-dean-of-college-university-of-chicago/

I was at GSB then and so I was not aware of the issues at The College. Perhaps @ThankYouforHelp and @exlibris97 can give us more perspective?

Replies to: A very interesting period of The College with a very interesting dean

  • kaukaunakaukauna Registered User Posts: 1,127 Senior Member
    Thanks for posting the article. I believe that through it’s discussion of the former college dean and beloved professor I have a better understanding of what you alumni are talking about. Compliments to the author too. It is an impressive job in any context but especially in a student newspaper.
  • uocparentuocparent Registered User Posts: 218 Junior Member
    Really great article about an interesting time in an interesting university. Kudos to the faculty in academia, as I've heard it's fraught with politics (all schools in general.) Started to watch some of JZ Smith's interviews, and trying to find some of his articles and books, but not many in ebook format. (UChicago, start putting stuff in electronic format, we need to preserve the content in these artifacts!)
  • ihs76ihs76 Registered User Posts: 1,866 Senior Member
    My 4 years in The College was entirely during his deanship. There were many somewhat eccentric professors on the campus at the time. Also, there were no non-tenure track teaching faculty (and certainly no grad student taught classes) so many of the courses, even the introductory ones, were taught by these colorful characters. I would say he was somewhere between 1 and 2 SD out from the norm in terms of eccentricity. We did like his unusual middle initial and commonly referred to him, the few times that we even thought of him, as "Jonathan Z." Most of the time, we didn't think of him and I had forgotten all about him until I saw this.
  • JBStillFlyingJBStillFlying Registered User Posts: 4,988 Senior Member
    "Also, there were no non-tenure track teaching faculty (and certainly no grad student taught classes) so many of the courses, even the introductory ones, were taught by these colorful characters."

    By the mid-80's, grad students were teaching undergrad econ. courses.
  • exlibris97exlibris97 Registered User Posts: 1,013 Senior Member
    @JBStillFlying That's big change from the late 70s and early 80s, though I must admit some of the tenured faculty were deathly boring. One was called the "Human Quualude". Still, this represents a major change in UC policy. They used to brag that unlike the Ivies, they didn't use grad students or adjunct faculty as lecturers.
  • JBStillFlyingJBStillFlying Registered User Posts: 4,988 Senior Member
    edited March 26
    @exlibris97 - just a guess but it might have had to do with a small(er) number of available faculty and lack of sufficient funding for their top PhDs. It's different now, but once upon a time the grad program was famous for admitting large numbers of hopefuls, then finding ways to fund (or fund better) those who passed their exams in a timely fashion. 198-199 didn't exist back then so undergrads started with micro and macro theory. At least some of those sections were taught by grad students, although the ones I knew could see the light at the end of the tunnel so were fairly advanced in their program. That's still very different from many other uni's where a grad student might be given a course right away. A faculty member who is fresh out of PhD-school is technically neither a grad student nor an adjunct; however, his/her teaching experience is going to be similar to the former as opposed to the latter. As you are hired to tenure-track just for the quality of your research, I'd take the adjunct over "The Human Quaalude" any day.
Sign In or Register to comment.