Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.

USC vs. UCLA for EE

spaghettimonsterspaghettimonster Registered User Posts: 32 Junior Member
I have been lucky enough to get accepted into both USC and UCLA for Electrical Engineering. Now I am faced with the difficult decision of choosing! These are the considerations I am making, and my current thoughts on them.

1. Cost
Fortunately, as I am a NMF, I would not have to pay 70k a year to attend USC. Thus, the cost of attending each school is roughly the same (USC would still cost a bit more, but not significantly so that I could use this reason to choose one over the other.)

2. Research Opportunities and Internships
I don't know how easy it is to get these opportunities at USC, I would love to hear other people's experiences. But at UCLA, I have been offered a program called Fast Track, in which kids start doing research and internships from their freshman year summers.

3. Getting Classes
I can't imagine that there would be a problem with this at USC, but I know that it can be a struggle to get classes at UCLA.

4. Reputation
I'm not obsessed with prestige, but I do recognize that it can be indicative of the quality of a school, and can be helpful later on when getting a job. Is there any difference between UCLA and USC regarding their reputation in EE?

I have already visited the UCLA campus and will be visiting again, but I love it there. I haven't visited USC yet, but I do plan to do so in a couple weeks. If you were in my position, what would you choose and why?
This discussion has been closed.