@Mamelot @drshoema @EarlVanDorn
I’m totally confused. Probably need a nap.
Mamelot finds 213 (99% 2014) corresponds to 218 for 99% estimate 2015 (concordance table).
drshoema et al find ~210 (across-board-99% 2015 CC data = 690 E+W 720 M) >> concordance table,
voila, 210 (2015) corresponds to 204 in 2014.
Perhaps, the 99% in 2015 is among 5 mil test takers and 99% in 2014 is based on 1.5 mil test takers?