Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Sign Up For Free
Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.
Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)
As a CC member, you can:
- Reply to threads, and start your own
- Create reports of your campus visits
- Share college photos and videos
- Find your dream college, save your search and share with friends
- Receive our monthly newsletter
Find A College
Top Forums
Rating Engineering majors difficulty-wise
theripcurl1969
Posts: 1,100Registered User Member
i would go with:
1.) ElecE/ChemE
2.) CompSci
3.) MechE
4.) BioE
5.) AeroE
6.) CivilE
7.) UndecE
you?
1.) ElecE/ChemE
2.) CompSci
3.) MechE
4.) BioE
5.) AeroE
6.) CivilE
7.) UndecE
you?
Post edited by theripcurl1969 on
Replies to: Rating Engineering majors difficulty-wise
2.) MechE/AE (they're really almost the same major within a few classes...and actually are combined at some schools)
3.) BioE, CivilE, StructE
4.) CS
5.) UndecE
Just my view, nothing scientific of course
All engineers will (or should) take the same math courses: diff equ, statistics, multivariate calculus, linear algebra.
The introductory courses for all the majors are about equally difficult. So, the question is, how hard are the 300 and 400 level courses in these majors?
Nuclear engineers will have to learn fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and physics of solid materials (materials science) along with the mechanical engineers. They will have to learn power systems, circuit theory, and control theory along with the EE's. They will need to know risk analysis, simulation and modeling, and optimization along with the systems engineers. So, I would submit, nuclear engineers (and aerospace engineers, which are similiar) have the 'worst' of all worlds.
But, really, you need to get a feel for what YOU might be interested in. What types of technology float your boat. I suggest looking at the curriculum for each of the majors--the actual names of the courses. Then, spend an afternoon at the engineering library. Look through the books on that subject. Are you drawn to that application of technology? If you find yourself immersed in a book on concrete load calculations, then civil engineering might be your 'bag'. If you are intrigued by a signal processing book (meet Monsieur Fourier!), then you are likely to have a leaning toward electrical engineering. Courses are harder if you're not interested in the subject. (The converse is not true. Even if you're interested in the topic, the course can still be a struggle. But, at least you get off to a good start!)
And, by the way, we're all geeks here. It's okay. You can talk to us. If you confess that you really were intrigued by a technical book, then we are brothers (or siblings!).
Remember, you are a big part of your education. It's a personal journey, and it's hard for us to advise you on what you will find challenging. It's nearly impossible to predict what will go beyond challenging to be overwhelming. So, first, know thyself. Then you will be better able to ask questions about different engineering fields.
Structural is nearly identical to aero and mech, fyi. I'm taking the same classes as my friend in Colorado who's working on a PhD in optical physics, and I'm in this so-called "easy" structural field. I have to do everything that mechanical engineers do (dynamics, materials, thermo, fluids, etc), all the risk/consequence stuff that systems engineers do, all the econ stuff that most other engineers don't have to deal with, and while I don't have to deal with circuits that often, I have to deal with government restrictions and codes, so therefore I have to do everything that a law student has to study, too! So, my field is harder than advanced physics, mechanical engineering, systems engineering, economics, AND law school, COMBINED! (You can spin this any way you want, is my point.)
All engineering majors are difficult, just in different ways. No matter how many college freshmen think civ eng is easy, studying tensor calculus and theoretical structural mechanics is still a pain in the butt!
-Amy
Eng Physics
ECE (My original)
ChemE
Mech/Aero
Materials
CS
Civ
Operations/Industrial (My Major)
Enviro
Any other engineering such as nuclear I feel I do not know enough about to comment.
Once you decide which area you're going to specialize in, though, (ie, I decided to specialize in structural engineering, which, as it turns out, is actually really complicated... think "systems engineering meets mechanical, but bolt everything to the earth, which sinks and moves, and then make the structure stand still and carry extreme loads"...) then it gets really complicated, really quickly, because instead of a broad, survey-like curriculum, you're getting into the math and science of whatever specialization you've decided upon.
Wow, hah, I always wanted to major in ECE (and that's now my "anticipated major" after getting in to Cornell ED), but I am pretty sure now I'm going to go with Operations Research.
So you think OR is definitely "easier" than ECE was? As in it's not too hard to keep a decent (I just want to try and keep a 3.0+, 3.5+ and I'd be ecstatic) GPA or anything?
Also, how would you describe Cornell's OR program in general? I have always liked computers and math/science stuff but also like econ/business/history so I'm thinking OR would suit me better than pure ECE.
Thanks!
I have similar interests, including economics/political economy, mathematics, physics, business and some philosophy.
With that in mind, how does computer science compare? CS pays more than all the other disciplines at Cornell, with an average of 66k, so that's an added benefit if it's relevant to my interests.
Anyways when people say "difficulty" i like to measure it with the total hours of work you put in for your classes since thats what it ultimately comes down to for me and i think it is probably the most reliable way of measuring "difficulty". Since CS people spend countless days and nights coding shouldnt they be right on top?