doschicos20840 replies216 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
Yeah, if you aren't planning to store it, I don't see the need to fear raw garlic. Do you not eat raw garlic at all?
If you are cautious, my suggestion above of heating the oil would kill that tiny risk if you get the oil to a certain temp.
lamom1344 replies42 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
edited February 2016
Sounds good to me, actually I hate raw garlic but the combination with bread is so wonderful. . Google results brought up botulism- mention was made that spores would grow in the anerobic conditions of the oil. I'm not going to store it or try to make infused oil. I buy garlic olive oil for cooking from local shop
nottelling4269 replies60 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
Do you use an apostrophe in the phrase "for convenience' sake"? (I'm not interested in hearing views on what the hypertechnical rules require; I am interested in what you do in actual practice).
Pizzagirl40174 replies320 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
Wouldn't it be "for convenience's sake"? The apostrophe hanging out there doesn't make sense, as it's not something like "the dogs' house" (meaning multiple dogs).
nottelling4269 replies60 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
Thanks! We are having an argument at work, and I agree that the apostrophe looks dumb.
But there's more dissension on the issue than you would think! The New York Times is not consistent; it sometimes uses "for convenience' sake" and sometimes "convenience's sake." The New Yorker uses "for convenience's sake" except when they are quoting Virginia Woolf. Older editions of the Chicago Manual of Style apparently specifically reference "for convenience' sake" but new editions drop the example altogether (but do include "for goodness' sake" but also "for appearance's sake").
Anyway, it's a dumb argument but a bunch of us were stuck in a conference room waiting for someone, and doing some group editing.
greenwitch8719 replies41 threadsRegistered UserSenior Member
What's going on with the west coast drought? I haven't heard much lately and I'd love some details from those of you who were xeriscaping and saving shower water a few months ago.
Replies to: Random Questions
Just don't. It is a ridiculous fear.
If you are cautious, my suggestion above of heating the oil would kill that tiny risk if you get the oil to a certain temp.
Probably faced with this dilemma, I would rewrite the sentence to say "for the sake of convenience"
But there's more dissension on the issue than you would think! The New York Times is not consistent; it sometimes uses "for convenience' sake" and sometimes "convenience's sake." The New Yorker uses "for convenience's sake" except when they are quoting Virginia Woolf. Older editions of the Chicago Manual of Style apparently specifically reference "for convenience' sake" but new editions drop the example altogether (but do include "for goodness' sake" but also "for appearance's sake").
Anyway, it's a dumb argument but a bunch of us were stuck in a conference room waiting for someone, and doing some group editing.
The video will make you smile!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/golf/11-year-old-makes-incredible-ace-playing-with-tiger-woods-at-bluejack-national/ar-BBqh49B?li=BBnbfcL
before Memorial Day?
before Easter?
at the beach next week?