Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Sign Up For Free
Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.
Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)
As a CC member, you can:
- Reply to threads, and start your own.
- Post reviews of your campus visits.
- Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
- Search from over 3 million scholarships.
Quick Links
Find A College
Articles: Expert Advice
Top Forums
Featured Threads
- New to the College Admissions Arena? Learn These Key Terms — CCEdit_Torrey
- Here's the Journey An Application Can Take When An Admission Office Receives It — CCEdit_Torrey
- Issues to Consider When Someone Offers to Put in A Good Word for You With Admissions — CCEdit_Torrey
- 3 Students Who Didn’t Break 20 on the ACT Share Their College Acceptances — CCEdit_Torrey
Why are 4.0s rejected?
Mezona
Registered User Posts: 10 New Member
in UC Transfers
So far, after looking at the Cal/UCLA 2015-16 transfer threads, I saw quite a few 4.0s that got rejected. I wanted to ask, why was this? I understand that a few more factors like Major prep and IGETC completion are also a large factor, but most of the 4.0s that I saw receive rejection also had those factors along with it. Not only that, these people also had a fair amount of E/Cs. It seems like it could be because of their major and if it's impacted or not, but even then, I saw a few non-impacted majors get denied.
All things aside, though, why are 4.0s rejected? What are some of the common reasons why they get rejected? What can those with a 4.0 do to further increase their admissions chances to these high-ranking UCs? I understand that a 4.0 GPA does not equal 100% guarantee, but I thought that GPA was one of the most important, defining factors among transfer admission. Not only that, a 4.0 applicant usually has those other defining factors (i.e. major prep) along with that GPA. Maybe I'm wrong, though?
All things aside, though, why are 4.0s rejected? What are some of the common reasons why they get rejected? What can those with a 4.0 do to further increase their admissions chances to these high-ranking UCs? I understand that a 4.0 GPA does not equal 100% guarantee, but I thought that GPA was one of the most important, defining factors among transfer admission. Not only that, a 4.0 applicant usually has those other defining factors (i.e. major prep) along with that GPA. Maybe I'm wrong, though?
This discussion has been closed.
Replies to: Why are 4.0s rejected?
They applied to Haas and didn't have the leadership skills, work experience, etc. that Haas looks for
They didn't have all the pre-reqs required in their major
There could be lots of reasons.
Another thing never mentioned- suspected plagiarism. A poster up here a while back, 4.0, all req completed, tons of related ECs. Applied to Communications. Rejected at UCLA. Well, ok, it's a tough one, but a bit surprising; then rejected at UCSD. This seemed doubly odd. He did get into UCSB so I knew it wasn't a unit issue. My first thought was they don't believe he wrote his essay (or something similar). I have no idea, but it entered my head.
The mom of a friend of mine reads scholarship essays for SCU and she says sometimes it's glaring that someone else wrote the essay.
He also could have been lying about his 4.0.
I have 4 Ws and 2 NPs. And my gpa is 4.0.
Going to apply this fall as Anthropology B.A. Let's see what happens :D
-didn't complete correct/required coursework
-had no ECs
-poor personal statement (seriously, I re-read one for someone after they were rejected and it literally made no sense. It was like a spam bot just spewed a bunch of random stuff and interlaced the words "achieve", "dream", "desire", and "academics")
-similar to a poorly written personal statement; a personal statement that doesn't answer the prompt (yeah, slam poetry might be your thing, but the ADCOM doesn't want to read your oddly formatted/punctuated piece)
-forgot vital application steps like the TAU
-are 1 year transfers and may have a 4.0 but don't have 30 units by the time they apply
-getting caught in a lie
But honestly, its the didn't do required coursework that I think gets most people. When I applied I triple checked the assist page and UCLA's transfer-admit-by-major page several times.
And re PS, you will not get rejected solely due to a PS. It says so on the UC q+a. A PS can only help. Unless, of course, they suspect plagiarism. Also, not answering the prompt will not cause rejection. I know ppl who did that and got in. And again the UC very clearly says you will never get rejected solely due to a bad PS. The sole purpose of a PS is to help. (BTW, I answered the wrong prompt and got Berkeley and UCLA.)
And having no ECs will only affect you if you're a competing borderline student - except for Haas. In general, the UCs don't put that much stock in ECs.
So of your list I would say required coursework missing, leaving out a vital step, lying, and under minimum units, which you didnt mention.
We had a smart-aleck-type kid, about 15-20 years ago, ask a popular math teacher for a letter of recommendation at our school.
The student liked this teacher since the teacher was smart, funny and very organized in his teaching style. From what I heard, the teacher tried to have the student ask someone else; saying that he was behind in his letters, and that it might be better to go with someone else, who could meet the time deadline. The student insisted that he wanted this teacher's recommendation.
So the teacher wrote up a LOR.
The 4.0 student and parent sued the school district claiming that the student didn't get into the right colleges because the LOR, sent in by the teacher, didn't praise the student enough and the kid's life was ruined forever.
The LOR apparently was a list of the kid's activities and grades, with the teacher indicating that he had known the student for a couple of years. What was later revealed in court was that the kid was not a nice kid. He was smug and mean. He was always in the VPs office dealing with disciplinary issues and Dad had rescued and condoned his child's behaviors.
The math teacher indicated, that the student was always late to class and tried to be a class clown, often interrupting the teacher. So the teacher wrote a letter that was basically a list. No other coach or teacher had written any letters. The coaches told the courtroom that they were glad they hadn't been asked to write a LOR.
The Judge came back and said that the admissions people had a right to choose whomever they wanted.
After the case was thrown out, the school district required waivers.
When a high schooler applies to college, they usually do not know what they want to major in and may change their minds a few times. ECs can still show a bit of passion and dedication. But when a transfer student applies, it's assumed that not only do you already know what you want to major in, but you want to major in it badly (atleast if you're applying to a prestigious school).
If you really have a passion to become a business major, then getting a 4.0 wouldn't satisfy you're hunger for business. You want to know EVERY rule in the book AND then practice them with wherever you can start because you love it so much. ECs wouldn't be a task, they'd be part of your life. If it's genuine, it'll just show.
If you just wanted to major in business for the sake of getting a job, you could go to any decent university, but if you want the priviledge of being able to take world-known classes, it would be obvious based on what you've done outside of the class.
I of course am but a mere CC freshman, but I think that explanation is pretty logical.