We have changed the way we log in on College Confidential. Read more here.
Williams vs Northwestern
This discussion has been closed.
Recent Activity
-
891 36
-
133 7
-
57 1
-
242 7
-
10 0
-
67 3
-
1 0
-
2.3K 51
-
49 2
-
21.8K 632
Replies to: Williams vs Northwestern
All of the schools comparable to Northwestern and Williams are flooded with liberals. Intellectual conservatives in office are an endangered species these days due to the Koch funding available to challenge any independent thinker from the right. With so few intellectual conservatives in office these days, it's no wonder that there are so few role models for young intellectual conservatives to emulate. Most conservatives I know take the "I'm not political" tack so as not to be attacked by the raging left, whereas the raging right is decidedly anti-intellectual and doesn't hold them in any higher regard. It's really a shame since I think we would all benefit from serious thought with some balance.
I would shoot for UChicago if you want a more balanced student body. That university seems to have gone out of its way to create safe spaces for endangered conservatives.
Neither Williams nor Northwestern is particularly extreme politically, there are fiscal conservatives and pro-military conservatives and old money conservatives at both of them. However, I suspect that if you walked around carrying a sign saying "Gay Marriage is Evil and Should Be a Crime" you would get a lot of pushback. Very few, if any, elite colleges are socially conservative anymore.
Citation, please.
And also, are you sure you meant Koch in your allegation?
I don't want to violate the terms of service, and if I did I certainly didn't intend to. I didn't realize what I said is controversial or disputed. I'm still not sure it is. I'll let you google "Koch tea party" and I'm sure you'll find plenty of citations, and you can take it from there on whether you think there is a relationship.
I'm merely offering support and encouragement to a young person who is looking for an education not an indoctrination.
Is it possible the echo chamber line you meant said Soros and not Koch?
Forgive me if I find that statement ironic. Maybe if you would have just typed the last of your paragraphs, or simply recomended a source like the ISI guide (link below) I could accept it.
https://www.amazon.com/Choosing-Right-College-2014-15-Lesser-Known/dp/1610170776/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1475524029&sr=8-3&keywords=conservative+college+guide
Exactly. What is your point?
After Koch and their minions successfully vanquished 36 year veteran Republican Senator Richard Lugar in a primary, most others got the message that compromise will be punished and there stopped being any rational healthy debate in both chambers. Olympia Snowe retired over this.
IMHO, this is exactly why it's hard to find any healthy rational debate on campuses that attract the most intellectual students either. The open minded center has been virtually eliminated from public life leaving nobody for intellectual conservatives to have intelligent conversations with. What remains are extreme positions where nobody is willing to see an alternative rationale point of view. As with Congress, this has gotten out of control on many campuses to the point of absurdity. I applaud the healthy actions taken by the University of Chicago to make sure that all points of view are welcome and that debate is based on principles, and not personal attacks.
We're from Boston and my family tends to lean left, but what I saw when we went to visit campuses like Swarthmore made my skin crawl. I encouraged my kids to try to find schools where they would meet good well meaning folks who lean right and have honest respectful conversations, not view them as the enemy. I think both of my Ds are richer for the experience, and though they still lean left, they now see things like tradeoffs and recognize that not every problem has a simple minded solution. In fact my D has had real problems with some extremely liberal friends who begrudged her for making good money while they complain that the non-profits that they chose to work for don't pay well enough. I just scratch my head.
Mr. Austere, I'm not sure what exactly you mean by openness and what you object about it.
Also, what exactly did you notice about Swarthmore?
Re Swarthmore, I can't exactly recall the specific thing they were protesting that day, but it was some art thing prominently displayed with a way out of the mainstream in your face message. I asked the tour guide if everybody was so liberal, who was there to argue with? She didn't think it was a problem - there are different degrees of liberal. Looked like a lot of group-think to me. D liked it. I'm glad she didn't go there.
Mr. Austere, IMHO, Swarthmore is definitely not the place for you.
My point: Why would the Koch brothers fund challenges to thinkers from the right when they support them? What am I missing?
Maybe I should have said they fund (challenges from the right) to (independent thinkers). Independent thinkers being anybody that may have an independent opinion of their own that may differ from the Koch platform. Basically, they have been supporting primary challenges from people more conservative than independent thinking Republicans who consider compromise with Democrats. That is what I mean by a challenge from the right.
What I think is more important for you to avoid is a high level of political activism -- the in-your-face mentality might be a bit much.
Williams and Northwestern aren't particularly known for activism. I think that list might include schools like Oberlin, Hampshire and Wesleyan. Maybe add Vassar and Swarthmore -- quite left, though i''m not sure how heavily into activism they are.
But the existence of fairly pleasant, polite, and fair debate should not dissuade you from any school. It's the stuff of life and, given the vitriol we witness from both (all) sides in an election year, such practice will help you and your classmates become the solution.
OK, I will accept you at your word that it was ineffective sentence structure, but I must say that explanation doesn't make a lot of sense to me given the context of the full statement:
It clearly indicates you said: Intellectual conservatives are endangered due to Koch funding. Since the Kochs are conservative, I continue to believe it is possible you made a mistake -- which is OK, btw, we all do.
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/01/31/12105/koch-brothers-pour-more-cash-think-tanks-alec
Thank you.
Conservatives who can think independently of the Koch minions are endangered by Koch funding. That is why there is no longer any debate. Nobody is listening to each other anymore. That is why everyone is so polarized and why campuses have run amok with groupthink and why a conservative student like the OP has trouble finding a decent place to go to college where he/she won't be red meat for the wolf pack.
I won't comment other than to let you read "Dark Money" by Jane Mayer.