<p>
</p>
<p>As others have mentioned, public institutions also receive some measure of support from the state (albeit perhaps not what it was decades ago), so their endowments don’t need to be as large as privates.</p>
<p>All things being equal, I agree that for two endowments of the same size that, yes, endowment per student probably becomes more relevant. However, I don’t believe that you can compare a smaller overall endowment but higher per student with a much larger (but smaller per student) overall endowment due to economies of scale and raw overall economic strength of a much greater endowment. The ability to finance large construction projects, bring in star faculty, and fund many programs is more a function of the overall endowment strength than a per student number. </p>
<p>As an aside, it’s funny you mention Princeton vs. UT as an example. Just an anecdote showing why total endowment or endowment per student don’t always tell the full story: </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>As the cost of acquiring manuscripts soars, Princeton increasingly finds itself on the sidelines
[PAW</a> November 16, 2005: Features](<a href=“http://www.princeton.edu/~paw/archive_new/PAW05-06/05-1116/features_manuscript.html]PAW”>PAW November 16, 2005: Features)</p>