<p>florida - lsu:</p>
<p>***! on the play after the fake fg, there was NOBODY down the middle. Jeez would it kill florida to give up a pass rusher and have ONE guy down field to prevent a down the middle touchdown??? That cost florida the game. That and that stupid ambitious attempt at blocking that fake field goal. next year baby,</p>
<p>JEEZ I’m still thinking about that game… DAMIT</p>
<p>at least michigan state won.</p>
<p>I can already see some smoke coming out of the BCS computer…</p>
<p>Which one?</p>
<p>The computers actually don’t really have a huge role in the BCS anymore. They’ve basically rigged the system to give the Coaches/Harris Polls the choice in all but the narrowest of cases.</p>
<p>The Sagarin computer ranks the Pac-10 conference #1, over the #2 SEC and the #3 Big-12. Just throwing that out there :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Apparently the computers know more than the experts at ESPN. Top to bottom, the Pac 10 is the strongest conference in the land. When you have UCLA or Washington as the 2nd worst team in your conference, you know that your conference is in good shape. Adding Utah next year will make the Pac 10 that much stronger. Colorado doesn’t do anything for the conference besides adding another TV market. Too bad this is the last year that everyone in the Pac 10 will play each other.</p>
<p>P.S.
Les Miles is f###ing crazy! His job was on the line and he calls a fake FG!!! LSU is the luckiest team in the country. They should have lost to UNC, Tenn, and UF.</p>
<p>Auburn-Arkansas on Saturday is going to be epic; too bad it’s not a night game, the atmosphere at Jordan-Hare would be incredible. </p>
<p>tOSU-Wisconsin will be good. Go Badgers! I really do not want to see the Bucks in the NC game again.</p>
<p>Watch out for Cal to beat USC for the first time since 2003. And Iowa will effectively end any remaining Heisman hype for Denard Robinson. It’s amazing how average he looks once he faces decent competition compared to UMass, Indiana, etc.</p>
<p>In 5 games Cal’s defense has allowed 3, 7, 52, 10, and 7 points. USC is ranked 13th in total offense. </p>
<p>Which Cal defense shows up? The one that gave up 6.75 ppg in 4 games or got toasted for 52 in the other one?</p>
<p>Hopefully USC’s defense (116th in pass defense) can improve, considering there’s no way to go but up.</p>
<p>And at least there’s some optimism for the future, with 2 sophomores and 1 true freshman starting in the secondary. Add a sophomore QB playing great (65% completion, 15 TD, 4 INT) and a true freshman WR (12 rec 224 yards vs Stanford).</p>
<p>Ingram’s Heisman hopes were done when he missed the first two games of the season, not after Saturday.</p>
<p>You can really say that Ingram’s chances to win the Heisman in 2010 were done the minute he won the trophy a year ago. Fair or not, past Heisman winners are held to a much higher standard than the rest of the field, and it’s difficult enough already for any player to put up the high stats needed to be a contender without having to go beyond.</p>
<p>Also, of course Ingram deserved it on his own, but there was some support because Alabama had never had a Heisman winner before despite being among the most legendary programs in college football and it was “about time”. Now that 'Bama has their Heisman winner, that is gone.</p>
<p>Yeah, I mean the fact that only 1 person has won two Heisman speaks for itself.
I really thought Tebow should have won his 2nd in 2008 instead of Bradford.
Sure Bradford was the better quarterback.
Sure Bradford had better stats.
Sure Bradford was in a higher scoring team.
But I hardly felt like Bradford was the “best” player.</p>
<p>tebow was highly overrated in college. Good sophomore year, but after that, I felt he regressed as a play maker, even though he was working to become a pocket passer.</p>
<p>Tebow scored had a ridiculous number of TD’s as a sophomore. His numbers as a junior and senior didn’t really meet the expectations he set. It was one of those weird cases where he actually was hurt by his team’s improvement.</p>
<p>USC AD says it looks like the divisions are going to be USC/UCLA/UA/ASU/Colo/Utah in the south and UW/WSU/UO/OSU/Cal/Stanford in the north. Also USC is pushing for Cal/Stanford to be permanent interdivision games for USC.</p>
<p>If Cal/Stanford end up in the north, playing them every year is a good compromise. I would like USC to always play UCLA, Cal, Stanford, and Notre Dame every year.</p>
<p>The Colorado-Cal game is going to be the biggest collision of hippie stoners this planet has ever seen.</p>
<p>how’s that? I thought kids from cal are mostly arrogant scrawny vegans from prestigious Asian families. Stop living in the 60s man. We’re in the immigration invasion era.</p>
<p>Well, UC-Santa Barbara doesn’t place in the PAC 10.</p>
<p>UCSB isn’t known for its hippy stoners. UC stereotype fail.</p>
<p>Electric game this weekend in Madison taking down #1! Wisconsin is back on track for a potential Rose Bowl if they take care of business and get some help for Sparty losing a few times along the way.</p>
<p>what the hell is wrong with the gators???</p>
<p>Oklahoma, wow. didn’t realize they don’t play nebraska this year. nice.</p>