<p>Yes, Satchel Paige Age Controversy = unnecessarily trivial</p>
<p>ok i got wary wrong then…</p>
<p>did u guys get eschew… something for the vocab?</p>
<p>lockclock, the answer was that she needed more space.</p>
<p>Her grandmother used smaller paper, and only used one side, and when the granddaughter wrote the letters she was literally “cramped” for space. They also wouldn’t have included the exact 8x11 unless size mattered. Also, nothing indicated she didn’t like the flowery patterns on her grandmother’s stationery, in fact I don’t think that was mentioned in the passage</p>
<p>
are you sure it said it was cramping her style? because that’s what i put, that she did not like the stationary.</p>
<p>Yes Krazy, something about doctors not being sure about a new drug = deleterious</p>
<p>wait I got exceedingly complicated </p>
<p>there wasnt anything in the passage that said that it was trivial right?</p>
<p>@violin I got eschew</p>
<p>I got eschew something…
What about the once that was like children particularly remember? I said ineffable…</p>
<p>what were the other answers to that q? i can’t remember what i put</p>
<p>Yes violinplayer, vocab question about native americans and new methods was eschew and something els</p>
<p>i put that she didn’t like the stationary too…it said that it “cramped her style” not that her style was cramped.</p>
<p>Darn. I thought the “need more space” option was that the table was too small.</p>
<p>@terebin that one was indelible I think</p>
<p>^ YES, i got eschew for one of them too!</p>
<p>yep. Let’s compile a list of answers/possible answers</p>
<p>ineffable is not correct.</p>
<p>I got eschew and indelible (meaning permanent), but I also put salutary rather than deleterious. I’m a champ -______-</p>
<p>is it trivial or exceedingly comlicated?</p>
<p>It’s trivial</p>
<p>I put trivial</p>